1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Informed refusal. Committee Opinion #237. Washington, DC: ACOG; 2000.
2. International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Recommendations on ethical issues in obstetrics and gynecology by the FIGO Committee for the Ethical Aspects of Human Reproduction and Women’s Health. London, UK: FIGO; 2000. Available at: http://www.figo.org/default.asp?id=6001 Accessed March 20, 2002.
3. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Patient choice and the maternal-fetal relationship. Ethics in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Washington, DC; ACOG; 1999.
4. Towner D, Castro MA, Eby-Wilkins E, Gilbert WM. Effect of mode of delivery in nulliparous women on neonatal and intracranial injury. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1709-1714.
5. Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, et al. Planned cesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet. 2000;356:1375-1383.
6. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Pain relief during labor. Committee Opinion #231. Washington, DC: ACOG; 2000.
7. Davila GW. Informed consent for obstetric management: a urogynecologic perspective. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2001;12:5:289-291.
8. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention. Family planning. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1999;48:1073-1080.
9. Faltin DL, Boulvain M, Irion O, et al. Diagnosis of anal sphincter tears by postpartum endosonography to predict fecal incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95:643.-
10. Runyon E, Valenzuela G, Harer WB. Patient attitude and perception: cesarean section vs vaginal delivery. Poster presentation at the American College of Osteopathic Obstetricians and Gynecologists annual convention, Orlando, Fla; 2000.
