Audio

Does robotic surgery merit widespread use in gynecology— or are claims of its benefits based mostly on hype?

We asked four AAGL participants that question. Hear select comments from your colleagues.

» ”When laparoscopic surgery started in 1989, there were no randomized trials for about 7 or 8 years, but that didn’t stop us from implementing the technology.”
Tommaso Falcone, MD, Cleveland, Ohio

» ”I think having people do laparoscopic tubals with a robot borders on malpractice.”
Mark Glasser, MD, San Rafael, California

» ”Our initial reaction was this is hype, this will go away in a few years. But over the years we’ve seen that it really does make a difference.”
Jamal Mourad, MD, Phoenix, Arizona

» ”I find more and more people trying to defend the robotic approach out of a personal or profit-based stance rather than an evidence-based stance.”
Stephen Montoya, MD, Las Vegas, Nevada


 


Recommended Reading

Myelomeningocele Repair Drives Changes in Fetal Surgery
MDedge ObGyn
Are Hysterectomies Really on the Decline?
MDedge ObGyn
Suture Method Linked to Vaginal Cuff Complications
MDedge ObGyn
Older Docs Still Balking at Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy
MDedge ObGyn
Study: Uterus Preservation Feasible with Mesh POP Repair System
MDedge ObGyn
How to avoid intestinal and urinary tract injuries during gynecologic laparoscopy
MDedge ObGyn
Synthetic full-length midurethral slings remain the standard of care for SUI surgery
MDedge ObGyn
Are hospital claims about the robotic approach to gynecologic surgery based on reliable data—or mostly hype?
MDedge ObGyn
When and how to place an autologous rectus fascia pubovaginal sling
MDedge ObGyn
Rectus fascia pubovaginal sling after an unsuccessful TVT
MDedge ObGyn