Expert Commentary

How can electronic fetal heart-rate monitoring best improve neonatal outcomes during induction of labor?

Author and Disclosure Information

When clear definitions of abnormal heart-rate patterns and tachysystole are addressed through specific interventions, according to this prospective, nonrandomized study of 14,398 women undergoing induction of labor with oxytocin.

Clark SL, Meyers JA, Frye DK, Garthwaite T, Lee AJ, Perlin JB. Recognition and response to electronic fetal heart rate patterns: impact on newborn outcomes and primary cesarean delivery rate in women undergoing induction of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(4):494.e1–e6.


 

References

In this prospective cohort study of women undergoing induction of labor of a singleton fetus at term (≥37 weeks), Clark and colleagues examined each patient chart for adherence to 6 clinical practices:

  • fetal weight estimated prior to induction
  • clinical assessment of pelvic adequacy prior to induction
  • completion of a safety checklist prior to induction
  • completion of a safety checklist every 30 minutes during induction
  • oxytocin infusion rate decreased if the fetal heart rate did not meet defined requirements
  • oxytocin infusion rate decreased if uterine activity did not meet defined requirements.

Defined requirements for fetal heart rate included at least 1 acceleration of 15 bpm x 15 seconds in 30 minutes, or adequate variability for 10 of the previous 30 minutes. There should have been no more than 1 late deceleration in the previous 30 minutes. And there should have been no more than 2 variable decelerations exceeding 60 seconds and decreasing more than 60 bpm from baseline in the previous 30 minutes.

Defined requirements for uterine activity included no more than 5 contractions in 10 minutes for any 20-minute interval. There should have been no 2 contractions longer than 120 seconds in duration. In addition, the uterus should have been soft upon palpation between contractions. If an intrauterine pressure catheter was in place, measurement in Montevideo units should have been less than 300 mm Hg, with baseline resting tone of less than 25 mm Hg.

Outcome measures included admission to a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), 1- and 5-minute Apgar scores of less than 7, and primary cesarean delivery.

Study findings underscore value of a checklist
The study found that completion of a safety checklist every 30 minutes during labor was associated with a significantly reduced rate of NICU admission and cesarean delivery. When the clinician stopped or reduced oxytocin for failure to meet specific uterine activity requirements, the rate of NICU admission also was reduced, but there were no differences in other outcomes. When the clinician stopped or reduced oxytocin for a failure to meet specific fetal heart-rate requirements, the rate of NICU admission was significantly reduced, as was the rate of low Apgar scores at birth, but there was a significantly higher rate of cesarean delivery (26.6% vs 17.5%).

Strengths include size of the study
This is a large study in a population with demographics that likely reflect those of the general US population. The study size permitted detection of relatively small differences in outcome.

The data clearly support the conclusions that “electronic fetal heart-rate monitoring improves neonatal outcomes when unambiguous definitions of abnormal fetal heart rate and tachysystole are coupled with specific interventions” and that “utilization of a checklist for oxytocin monitoring is associated with improved neonatal outcomes.” However, data were conflicting regarding the impact of a standard oxytocin checklist on the rate of cesarean delivery.

What this evidence means for practice
Implementation of a conservative intrapartum checklist has been shown to improve specific measures of newborn outcome. Further study is needed to define the impact on the rate of cesarean delivery.
—David A. Miller, MD

Share your thoughts on this article! Send your Letter to the Editor to rbarbieri@frontlinemedcom.com. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.

Recommended Reading

Are birthing centers a safe alternative for women?
MDedge ObGyn
ACOG: Immediate postpartum IUD the ‘next big thing’
MDedge ObGyn
DDW: Gestational diabetes linked to increased NAFLD risk in middle age
MDedge ObGyn
Food recalls highlight risk of listeriosis
MDedge ObGyn
CDC: Tdap vaccine coverage during pregnancy is low
MDedge ObGyn
Call to action: Saving 100,000 U.S. mothers in 5 years
MDedge ObGyn
Delayed cord clamping linked to better neurodevelopmental outcomes
MDedge ObGyn
Buprenorphine is best for opioid-addicted pregnant women
MDedge ObGyn
Is azithromycin a good alternative to erythromycin for PPROM prophylaxis?
MDedge ObGyn
Report IDs insurance barriers to breastfeeding services
MDedge ObGyn

Related Articles