Conference Coverage

AAAAI: Risks comparable in adult asthma patients given fluticasone and salmeterol plus fluticasone combo

View on the News

Highest risk patients excluded

At first glance, these results appear to be quite reassuring. However, patients were excluded from the trial if they had a history of life-threatening or unstable asthma. Why this decision was made is never explained, but it is bewildering that the patients at highest risk for the composite primary outcome were purposely left out. Thus, it is not surprising that only two patients in the trial had life-threatening asthma and that adherence to study medication was 95%, a rate of success unheard of in clinical practice and even in well-controlled clinical trials. The exclusion of patients with unstable asthma probably selected those who were prone to be highly adherent to their usual therapy.

What practical conclusions can be drawn from this study? It is clear that among patients with asthma who have not had life-threatening episodes in the past and are highly adherent to their drug regimen, it is likely that the use of salmeterol together with fluticasone in a single inhaler is safe. For these patients and this combination, the black-box warning should be lifted. This is an important result, and it stresses once again that most patients with asthma, and especially those without serious episodes, can reach high levels of symptom control and avoid frequent exacerbations by simply using their inhalers every day.

What remains unanswered is whether this conclusion applies to patients who have the most severe and unstable disease, since these are the patients for whom all guidelines still recommend the use of LABAs [long-acting beta-2 agonists], combined with inhaled glucocorticoids, as first-line treatment. For these patients, the safe clinical approach is to maintain the same precautions in using fluticasone-salmeterol that have been recommended until now for all patients with asthma.

Dr. Fernando Martinez is a professor of pediatrics and director of the Asthma/Airway Disease Research Center at the University of Arizona, Tucson. He made his comments in an editorial (N Engl J Med. 2016 Mar 2016. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1601040).


 

AT 2016 AAAAI ANNUAL MEETING

References

LOS ANGELES – Fluticasone-salmeterol inhalers (Advair) are as safe as and more effective than fluticasone monotherapy inhalers are for patients with moderate to severe asthma, according to a large, randomized trial from its drug maker, GlaxoSmithKline, presented at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology and simultaneously published online March 6 in the New England Journal of Medicine.

The study is the first of several that the Food and Drug Administration required from Glaxo and other manufacturers in 2010 to evaluate the safety of long-acting beta-2 agonists (LABAs) such as salmeterol when used in combination with inhaled corticosteroids, after it became clear that LABAs, when used alone, increase the risk of serious asthma complications, including death (N Engl J Med. 2016 Mar 6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1511049).

Dr. David Stempel

Dr. David Stempel

Current black box warnings on fluticasone-salmeterol (Advair), Merck’s mometasone-formoterol inhaler (Dulera), and AstraZeneca’s budesonide-formoterol combo (Symbicort)note that data are “inadequate to determine” if concomitant steroids mitigate the risk of LABAs.

Merck and AstraZeneca’s studies are ongoing, but Glaxo’s initial results seem reassuring. “I think what this study really does is provide evidence to answer the question that FDA was asking about safety. This is [also] the first really large study to show a decrease in exacerbations with [fluticasone-salmeterol],” principal investigator Dr. David Stempel, with Glaxo’s Respiratory Clinical Development program in Durham, N.C., said at the annual meeting.

However, because “patients with a history of life-threatening or unstable asthma” – including those who, at any point, had been intubated for asthma – “were excluded from the study, our results cannot be extrapolated to such patients,” the researchers wrote.

The inclusion criteria were otherwise broad: Adults and adolescents at least 12 years old, with a history of severe asthma exacerbations requiring the use of inhaled glucocorticoids or hospitalization in the previous year, but not in the month before enrollment, were included. There were 5,834 subjects randomized to fluticasone-salmeterol and 5,845 to fluticasone alone, both for 26 weeks. Adherence to the study medications was 95%.

There were 36 serious asthma-related events – endotracheal intubation or hospitalization – in 34 patients (0.58%) in the fluticasone-salmeterol group, and 38 events in 33 patients (0.56%) in the fluticasone-only group. The hazard ratio for serious asthma-related events with fluticasone-salmeterol was 1.03 (95% confidence interval, 0.64-1.66), indicating that the safety of the combination was comparable with that of fluticasone monotherapy (P = .003). There were no asthma-related deaths in the trial, and two intubations in the fluticasone-only group.

The risk of a severe asthma exacerbation was 21% lower with fluticasone-salmeterol (HR, 0.79; 95% CI 0.70-0.89). While 480 fluticasone-salmeterol patients (8%) had at least one severe asthma exacerbation, at least one severe exacerbation occurred in 597 fluticasone-only patients (10%; P less than 0.001). “The difference was most prominent among adolescents, in whom the risk was 35% lower,” the investigators wrote.

“We found that ... the risk of serious asthma-related events was no greater when salmeterol was delivered by inhaler in a fixed-dose combination with fluticasone propionate than when fluticasone was administered alone,” and the “clinical benefits of fluticasone-salmeterol were significant,” they concluded.

The trial, which was designed with FDA guidance, excluded patients with life-threatening or unstable asthma in order to “mimic the population in which the (original LABA safety) signal was seen” in earlier studies; “the signal wasn’t seen specifically in that population.” Even so, “very few patients were eliminated due to a history of life-threatening asthma,” Dr. Stempel said.

It’s unclear why concomitant steroids reduce the risk. “LABA monotherapy may mask underlying disease by providing a temporary reduction in symptoms but ultimately placing patients at risk for serious exacerbations. When you give short- or long-acting bronchodilators, patients feel better, but you’re not treating the underlying disease; corticosteroids treat the underlying inflammatory component,” he said

The company will soon publish results from a similar fluticasone-salmeterol safety trial in children 4-11 years old. “I hope were finished” after that, “but we have to have a discussion with FDA to see what’s next.” The agency might want to pool data from the incoming trials to look at LABA-containing inhalers as a class. “It’s too premature to know where we’ll go with the box warning, but there’s a lot more information now than was available when the box first appeared in 2003,” Dr. Stempel said.

The work was funded by GlaxoSmithKline, and the authors are current or former employees.

aotto@frontlinemedcom.com

Recommended Reading

Human gene editing consensus study underway
MDedge Pediatrics
Why so many pertussis outbreaks despite acellular pertussis vaccine? A call to action
MDedge Pediatrics
U.S. flu activity at its highest level yet
MDedge Pediatrics
ACIP recommends LAIV as an option for all people with egg allergies
MDedge Pediatrics
2015-2016 flu vaccine 59% effective, CDC says
MDedge Pediatrics
U.S. flu activity continues steady climb
MDedge Pediatrics
Asthma hospitalizations linked to prevalence of common cold in children
MDedge Pediatrics
Bedside asthma medication delivery tied to lower ED readmissions
MDedge Pediatrics
Vaccines committee approves recommended influenza strains for 2016-2017 vaccine
MDedge Pediatrics
U.S. flu activity falls for first time since early January
MDedge Pediatrics