News

Supreme Court to hear debate over contraception coverage mandate


 

References

However, the Council for Christian Colleges & Universities argues the government’s decision to exempt some religious employers from providing contraceptive coverage while requiring others to comply with the mandate “demonstrates that the government’s approach is not the least restrictive means necessary to advance its interests.”

“Civil rights should not vary based on whether that institution is or is not affiliated with a church or other house of worship,” the council wrote in its brief to the Supreme Court. “Religious exercise is not tied to one’s affiliation but rather the source and sincerity of one’s belief and the desire to exercise it. That truth appears to be one the government has been unable to grasp or comprehend as it decides who is sufficiently ‘religious’ to have religious beliefs worthy of protection.”

agallegos@frontlinemedcom.com

On Twitter @legal_med

Pages

Recommended Reading

NASPAG: Obesity raises unique contraceptive concerns in teens
MDedge Pediatrics
Mobile apps: Powerful untapped family planning resource?
MDedge Pediatrics
HHS finalizes religious exemptions in ACA contraception mandate
MDedge Pediatrics
Recall issued on U.S. Compounding sterile products
MDedge Pediatrics
Reality check about IUDs
MDedge Pediatrics
Oral contraception and medical liability
MDedge Pediatrics
Few teen females prescribed teratogenic meds get contraceptive advice, Rx
MDedge Pediatrics
CDC: Screen women for alcohol, birth control use
MDedge Pediatrics
Unintended pregnancies fall to 30-year low
MDedge Pediatrics
Better billing privacy protections needed for youth
MDedge Pediatrics