From the Journals

Inactivated flu vaccine more effective than live version


 

FROM THE NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE

The inactivated influenza vaccine is more effective than the quadrivalent live attenuated vaccine, according to a study conducted by the Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Network.

After poor live vaccine performance in young children during the 2013-2014 flu season, the A(H1N1)pdm09 strain was changed. In response to earlier reports that the A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccine strain had poor thermostability, it was updated to A/Bolivia/559/2013 (an A/California/7/2009-like virus) for the 2015-2016 influenza season. Unfortunately, the changes did not increase the vaccine’s immunogenicity. At study sites in Michigan, Pennsylvania, Texas, Washington, and Wisconsin, 6,879 patients aged 6 months or older who presented for acute respiratory illness with a cough of 7 or fewer days were tested for influenza. Of those, 1,309 (19%) tested positive. Vaccination histories were taken from parent interviews and electronic health records.

Photo of a toddler receiving a vaccination from a health care worker Yarinca/Stockphoto
Vaccine effectiveness was estimated to be 48% in all age groups and for each virus subtype or lineage (95% confidence interval, 41-55; P less than .001); however, significant effectiveness was observed for only the inactivated influenza vaccine (P less than .001), compared with the quadrivalent live attenuated vaccine (P = .86), according to Michael L. Jackson, PhD, associate investigator at the Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, and his coauthors. The 136 children who received the live vaccine were significantly more likely to contract influenza than the 682 children who received the inactivated vaccine (odds ratio, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.6-4.6; P less than .001), without any significant benefit over those who received no vaccine (live vaccine effectiveness, 5%; 95% CI, –47 to 39; P = .8). Looking specifically at children aged 2-17 years old, the risk of influenza was not significantly lower among those who received the quadrivalent live attenuated influenza vaccine than among those who received no vaccine; the inactivated vaccine had a marked benefit over no vaccine (vaccine effectiveness, 60%; 95% CI, 47-70; P less than .001).

“Although the quadrivalent live attenuated vaccine remains licensed in the United States, the [Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices] did not recommend this vaccine for the 2016-2017 influenza season,” the investigators wrote.

Partial funding for the research came from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Institutes of Health. Dr. Jackson reported receiving a grant from Medimmune.

Read more in the New England Journal of Medicine (2017;377:534-43).

Recommended Reading

PANS and PANDAS – A step forward?
MDedge Pediatrics
Meningitis before age 3 months: Consider enterovirus and parechovirus
MDedge Pediatrics
New guidelines highlight rapid, interdisciplinary treatment of PANS/PANDAS
MDedge Pediatrics
Lessons emerge from Europe’s first enterovirus-related brain stem encephalitis outbreak
MDedge Pediatrics
South African child has suppressed HIV without ART since infancy
MDedge Pediatrics
Oral prophylaxis and vaginal ring effective in adolescent HIV prevention
MDedge Pediatrics
Campylobacteriosis incidence rises in U.S. from 2004 to 2012
MDedge Pediatrics
When patients get the travel bug, dermatologists should beware
MDedge Pediatrics
Acute otitis media: Which children to treat
MDedge Pediatrics
HPV vaccination rose after ACA implementation
MDedge Pediatrics