Conference Coverage

VIDEO: Trial points to using non-TNF biologic when first anti-TNF drug fails


 

AT THE ACR ANNUAL MEETING

References

SAN FRANCISCO – Rheumatoid arthritis patients who did not respond to the first tumor necrosis factor inhibitor they tried had a higher rate of good or moderate response when they switched to a non–TNF inhibitor biologic, rather than another anti-TNF agent, after 48 weeks in the first randomized trial to compare the two strategies.

The results of this French open-label study, called Rotation or Change, provides evidence to guide the choice of a second biologic in patients who fail first biologic treatment with an anti-TNF agent. The trial also confirms findings reported in observational registry studies, principal investigator Dr. Jacques-Eric Gottenberg said in an interview at the annual meeting of the American College of Rheumatology.

But in contrast to the main study results, a post hoc analysis suggested that a second TNF inhibitor may be just as effective as a non–TNF inhibitor biologic in patients who develop antidrug antibodies to the first TNF inhibitor, said Dr. Gottenberg of the department of rheumatology at Strasbourg (France) University Hospital.

He and his colleagues aimed to mimic what happens in daily practice by allowing participating rheumatologists at French academic medical centers to choose which drug each patient received after randomization. During 2009-2012, 292 patients were randomized to any of four TNF inhibitors (adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, or infliximab) or any of three non–TNF inhibitor biologics (abatacept, rituximab, or tocilizumab). (Golimumab was not available in France when the trial began in 2009.)

At 12 weeks, 48% of participants who switched to another TNF inhibitor had good or moderate responses based on European League Against Rheumatism criteria, and this rose to 52% at 24 weeks and then dropped to 43% at 48 weeks. At those time points, good or moderate response occurred in an additional 16%-18% of participants who switched to a non–TNF inhibitor biologic: 64% at 12 weeks, 70% at 24 weeks, and 60% at 48 weeks.

In the post hoc analysis of 278 patients who were tested for antidrug antibodies, 20 patients with ADAs who had been randomized to a non–TNF targeted biologic had a response at 24 weeks that was similar to 12 patients with ADAs who had been randomized to a second TNF inhibitor.

The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel.

jevans@frontlinemedcom.com

Recommended Reading

Serious infection risk rose with opioid use in rheumatoid arthritis
MDedge Rheumatology
No stone left unturned in ACR 2015 clinical sessions
MDedge Rheumatology
Shingles vaccine protection lasted 5-6 years in autoimmune disease patients
MDedge Rheumatology
Stroke risk rose in autoimmune disease patients after herpes zoster
MDedge Rheumatology
Jury still out on cannabinoid therapy for rheumatic diseases
MDedge Rheumatology
VIDEO: Mortality gap is closing between rheumatoid arthritis patients, general population
MDedge Rheumatology
VIDEO: Cardiovascular deaths declining in rheumatoid arthritis patients
MDedge Rheumatology
VIDEO: Real-world proof that treat-to-target works in rheumatoid arthritis
MDedge Rheumatology
Study backs broader use of aspirin to prevent preeclampsia
MDedge Rheumatology
VIDEO: Obesity decreased chances of sustained RA remission
MDedge Rheumatology