From the Journals

Sirukumab found effective, safe for highly refractory RA

View on the News

Comparison study would be useful

It would be useful to compare sirukumab’s efficacy against that of two other inhibitors of the interleukin-6 pathway, tocilizumab (Actemra) and sarilumab.

Dr. Roy M. Fleischmann

Dr. Roy M. Fleischmann

But until a head-to-head study is performed, it is likely that at least some patients will find sirukumab to be superior to these agents. The efficacy and the risk-benefit profile reported here support the use of sirukumab for active RA in patients who are refractory to TNF inhibitors and other treatments.

Roy Fleischmann, MD, is with the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Metroplex Clinical Research Center, both in Dallas. He reported receiving research grants and consulting fees from Genentech-Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, and GlaxoSmithKline. Dr. Fleischmann made these remarks in editorial accompanying Dr. Aletaha and colleagues’ report ( Lancet. 2017 Feb 15. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736[17]30405-1 ).


 

FROM THE LANCET

The investigational interleukin-6 inhibitor sirukumab proved effective and safe for rheumatoid arthritis patients who failed to respond to or were intolerant of multiple previous therapies in a phase III trial reported online in The Lancet.

Two different doses of sirukumab provided rapid and sustained improvements in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) signs and symptoms, physical function, and health status. These were accompanied by improvements in physical and mental well-being, a result that is particularly relevant for RA patients, who have a high prevalence of mood disorders. It has been estimated that 39% of RA patients have moderate to severe depressive symptoms, the investigators noted.

They assessed sirukumab in the manufacturer-funded trial involving 878 adults treated and followed at 183 centers in 20 countries across North America, Europe, Latin America, and Asia. These patients included 59% who had failed to respond to or had been intolerant of two or more biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (39% to two or more tumor necrosis factor inhibitors) and numerous other RA treatments.

The patients in the study, called SIRROUND-T, were randomly assigned to receive 50 mg sirukumab every 4 weeks (292 patients in the low-dose group), 100 mg sirukumab every 2 weeks (292 in the high-dose group), or matching placebo (294 patients in the control group) via subcutaneous injections for 52 weeks. Patients receiving placebo whose condition worsened were allowed an “early escape,” a blinded switch to either dose of the active drug for the remainder of the trial. At week 24, patients remaining in the placebo groups also were randomly assigned in a blinded manner to switch to active treatment (Lancet. 2017 Feb 15. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736[17]30401-4). All patients were allowed to continue using any concomitant disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). At baseline, only 80% were using a conventional synthetic DMARD, and about 25% of patients in each group were not taking methotrexate.

The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving an ACR20 response (a 20% or greater improvement in swollen joint count and tender joint count plus a 20% or greater improvement in at least three factors: pain, patient-assessed disease activity, physician-assessed disease activity, patient-assessed physical function, and C-reactive protein levels) at week 16. Sirukumab achieved higher levels of response in both the low-dose (40% of patients) and high-dose (45%) groups than did placebo (24%).

In addition, significantly higher proportions of patients receiving active treatment achieved the secondary endpoints of ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 at week 24. Greater improvements, including remission, also were noted with sirukumab than with placebo according to the Simplified Disease Activity Index, ACR/EULAR criteria, and the Health Assessment Questionnaire–Disability Index. And significantly greater improvements also were seen in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Fatigue score, the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, the Work Limitations Questionnaire, the EuroQol-5 Dimension questionnaire, and the EuroQol Health State Visual Analogue Scale.

In both active-treatment groups, all of these improvements were noted as early as within 2 weeks of starting treatment and persisted through follow-ups at week 24 and week 52.

Rates of adverse events, serious adverse events, and adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation were similar across the three study groups. Infections (primarily pneumonia) and infestations were the most frequent adverse events leading to discontinuation. No cases of tuberculosis or serious opportunistic infections were reported. Both doses of sirukumab induced declines in neutrophil, platelet, and white blood cell counts, as well as increases in alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, bilirubin, cholesterol, and triglycerides. Nine patients had hypersensitivity reactions, including one classified as serious dermatitis; all of these patients were taking the high dose of sirukumab. One of the five patient deaths that occurred, a fatal case of pneumonia, was considered possibly related to sirukumab.

This trial was funded by Janssen and GlaxoSmithKline, which also participated in the study design, data collection and analysis, and writing the results. Dr. Aletaha reported serving as a consultant for or receiving research support from AbbVie, Pfizer, Grünenthal, Merck, Medac, UCB, Mitsubishi/Tanabe, Janssen, and Roche. His associates reported ties to numerous industry sources.

Recommended Reading

Refractory RA patients respond well to peficitinib in phase II study
MDedge Rheumatology
Chikungunya arthritis symptoms reduced with immunomodulatory drugs
MDedge Rheumatology
Hydroxychloroquine dosing guidelines have little impact in clinical practice
MDedge Rheumatology
Perioperative infliximab does not increase serious infection risk
MDedge Rheumatology
ACR guidelines on HBV screening called inadequate
MDedge Rheumatology
Ultrasound guidance of early RA therapy doesn’t improve outcomes
MDedge Rheumatology
RA-BEAM trial shows that baricitinib improves RA symptoms, slows joint damage
MDedge Rheumatology
Methotrexate for RA: A 'fascinating drug’
MDedge Rheumatology
Pilot trial of first in kind biologic shows RA treatment potential
MDedge Rheumatology
Survey highlights interest in diet’s effects on RA
MDedge Rheumatology

Related Articles