Law & Medicine

Workers’ compensation law


 

Question: Employee, a poorly controlled diabetic, accidentally stepped on a nail at work. Surrounding cellulitis and abscess formation set in, but because he was slow in getting to a doctor, the infection invaded the underlying bone, causing osteomyelitis. He ended up with a partial foot amputation. In a claim for workers’ compensation (WC) benefits, which of the following is best?

A. Employee has a claim under WC, a quasi no-fault system that requires an employer to compensate its employees only for accidents occurring in the workplace.

B. Employer may offer employee’s preexisting diabetic condition and his failure to promptly seek medical attention as substantial rebuttable evidence against compensability.

C. A similar no-fault system has been proposed as an alternative to medical tort litigation, but it has yet to be established in the developed world.

D. All are incorrect.

E. All are correct.

Pages

Recommended Reading

McAneny: Transparency needed for meaningful talk on drug pricing
MDedge Rheumatology
Complementary and alternative medicine
MDedge Rheumatology
TNF inhibitor prices rose despite increased drug class competition
MDedge Rheumatology
Lawsuit against ABIM draws $200,000 in donation support
MDedge Rheumatology
Final ‘Vision’ report addresses MOC woes
MDedge Rheumatology
Physician PAC dollars support candidates against gun regulation
MDedge Rheumatology
Talk about déjà vu: Senators set to re-enact drug price hearing of 60 years ago
MDedge Rheumatology
What does 'Medicare for all' mean?
MDedge Rheumatology
Big pharma says it can’t drop drug list prices alone
MDedge Rheumatology
Malpractice suits are less frequent – but more costly
MDedge Rheumatology