Conference Coverage

Two biologics show no difference in axial spondyloarthritis radiographic progression over 2 years


 

AT EULAR 2023

Not a definitive answer about structural progression

An open question remains. Alexandre Sepriano, MD, PhD, a rheumatologist at Hospital Egas Moniz and researcher at NOVA Medical School, both in Lisbon, commented: “The study was designed to maximize the chances of detecting a difference, if any, in spinal radiographic progression between secukinumab 150 mg and 300 mg and adalimumab. The included patients had a high risk of progression at baseline; in addition to back pain, they either had elevated CRP or at least one syndesmophyte on spine radiographs. Consequently, baseline structural damage was high [mean mSASSS, 17].”

Alexandre Sepriano, MD, of Leiden University Medical Centre, the Netherlands, and EMEUNET’s Chair-Elect.

Dr. Alexandre Sepriano

“After 2 years, no difference was observed in the percentage of patients with no progression across the study arms. This finding does not definitively answer whether bDMARDs can modify structural progression or if secukinumab and adalimumab are equally effective in this regard,” explained Dr. Sepriano, who was not involved in the study. “However, there is good news for patients. Both secukinumab and adalimumab are potent anti-inflammatory drugs that effectively alleviate axial inflammation caused by the disease. This was demonstrated by the reduction in inflammatory scores on MRI in the SURPASS study. It aligns with robust evidence that both IL-17 inhibitors and TNF inhibitors are effective in improving symptoms in individuals with axSpA.

“Researchers continue to make significant efforts to understand how axial inflammation contributes to pathological new bone formation in axSpA,” Dr. Sepriano continued. “Understanding these mechanisms can guide future research aimed at interfering with disease progression. Furthermore, the use of new methods to quantify structural progression in axSpA, such as low-dose CT, which has shown greater sensitivity to change than traditional methods, can pave the way for new studies with fewer patients and shorter follow-up periods, thereby increasing the likelihood of detecting treatment effects.”

Dr. Baraliakos has received speaking and consulting fees and grant/research support from AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Chugai, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB. Dr. Sepriano has received speaking and/or consulting fees from AbbVie, Novartis, UCB, and Lilly. The trial was sponsored by Novartis.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Biosimilars and patients: Discussions should address safety, cost, and anxiety about change
MDedge Rheumatology
Meta-analysis examines cancer risk concern for JAK inhibitors
MDedge Rheumatology
NSAID use may mask MRI findings in a quarter of spondyloarthritis cases
MDedge Rheumatology
Axial spondyloarthritis versus axial psoriatic arthritis: Different entities?
MDedge Rheumatology
MACE, VTE rates compared between TNF and JAK inhibitors for AxSpA and PsA
MDedge Rheumatology
Researchers make headway in understanding axSpA diagnostic delay
MDedge Rheumatology
FDA approves autoinjector pen for Humira biosimilar, Cyltezo
MDedge Rheumatology
AxSpA effects may be more severe for Black patients
MDedge Rheumatology
FDA approves Yuflyma as ninth adalimumab biosimilar
MDedge Rheumatology
AxSpA remission on TNFi seen in half of patients with comorbid IBD
MDedge Rheumatology