News

Ignoring Sex Differences Undermines Research


 

SAN FRANCISCO — Lack of attention to biological differences between males and females may be hurting both sexes in the treatment of health problems.

Research in the past decade has begun to delve into sex differences in depression, pain perception, sleep, stroke, multiple sclerosis, drug responses, and more, speakers said at a meeting sponsored by the Institute of Medicine on sex differences and their implications for translational neuroscience research.

“The advances in molecular biology and in brain imaging make it clear that there's a biological basis to the sex differences,” said Rae Silver, Ph.D., who codirected the workshop and is a professor of natural and physical sciences at Barnard College and Columbia University, both in New York.

When researchers don't examine differences between males and females—in basic science on cell biology all the way up to human clinical trials—the resulting lack of data may lead to flawed conclusions. For example, data showing that only 20% of studies on heart disease have included women help to explain why the disease and its treatments are less well understood in women than in men, several speakers noted.

On the other hand, an investigational drug that may have been effective in treating chronic pain in men—but not women—was abandoned after the drug failed in a clinical trial that included both sexes but did not analyze differences in response by sex, another speaker said.

The IOM convened the workshop to follow up on its 2001 report, “Exploring the Biological Contributions to Human Health: Does Sex Matter?” which recommended that sex differences be studied “from womb to tomb” (across the lifespan), across species, and at the cellular level, and that all human diseases affecting both sexes be monitored for sex differences and similarities.

The progress reports at the workshop showed how much remains to be done, and generated lively debate about what the IOM, the National Institutes of Health, and the Food and Drug Administration could do to promote greater attention to sex differences in research and drug development.

Currently, only NIH-funded studies must include some attention to sex differences, and this requirement does not apply to studies funded by industry or other sources.

The NIH and the FDA created an online course on sex differences that offers continuing medical education credits to researchers and clinicians, said Dr. Vivian W. Pinn, director of the NIH Office of Research on Women's Health. The course provides a basic scientific understanding of the major physiological differences between the sexes, the influences these differences have on illness and health outcomes, and the implications for policy, medical research, and health care. It can be found at http://sexandgendercourse.od.nih.gov

Sex differences in disease susceptibility should be studied whenever there are differences between the sexes in anatomy, in physiology, in the incidence or age of onset of disease, in the symptoms or diagnosis of disease, or in the severity, progression, and outcome of disease, argued Kathryn Sandberg, Ph.D.

“There's growing interest because it's become clear that, in stroke, not only is there a sex difference in incidence, but also a sex difference in symptoms,” according to Dr. Sandberg, director of the center for the study of sex differences in health, aging, and disease at Georgetown University in Washington.

A recent study reported sex differences in types of acute ischemic stroke. Men are significantly more likely than women to have lacunar (39% vs. 29%) or atherosclerotic strokes (19% vs. 13%), whereas women are significantly more likely to have cardioembolic strokes than men (30% vs. 23%), she noted (Women's Health 2010;6:51–7).

“That's just screaming at you that there's a mechanism that has to be studied,” Dr. Sandberg said.

Other speakers emphasized the need for more research on sex differences in major depression, which is twice as common in females as in males, and in multiple sclerosis, which is two to four times more common in females than in males.

Because multiple sclerosis relapses in 80% of women during pregnancy, and findings from animal tests have suggested that estriol protects against multiple sclerosis, a clinical trial is underway of estriol treatment in women with the disease, said Dr. Rhonda Voskuhl, professor of neurology at the University of California, Los Angeles.

Similarly, animal test data showed a protective effect of testosterone in men, and a pilot study of testosterone gel in men with multiple sclerosis showed markers of improvement.

“I'm now primed to do a clinical trial in men,” she added.

The problem is that both of these are generic drugs, so it will be difficult to find the $5-$25 million needed for phase II/III clinical trials. “It's a shame to drop estradiol and testosterone merely because nobody can make money on it. If you're a patient, you'd rather take estriol, which has been given to hundreds of thousands of people, instead of compound x, y, or z” with unknown side effects, she said.

Pages

Recommended Reading

U.S. Unveils Plan to Protect Health in Emergencies : Many of the challenges physicians faced after Hurricane Katrina could have been avoided.
MDedge Rheumatology
Former CDC Chief Gerberding to Run Vaccines at Merck
MDedge Rheumatology
SwipeIT Pushes for Machine-Readable ID Cards
MDedge Rheumatology
White House Announces Health IT Grants
MDedge Rheumatology
States Pick Up the Slack on Cancer Care Reform Issues
MDedge Rheumatology
CMS Recommends Pediatric Quality Measures
MDedge Rheumatology
Physicians, Be Wary of Medicare's RAC Audits
MDedge Rheumatology
Policy & Practice : Want more health reform news? Subscribe to our podcast – search 'Policy & Practice' in the iTunes store
MDedge Rheumatology
Docs May Not Embrace Health IT Incentives : Be prepared. Physicians may say: 'Are you kidding? I don't want to have anything to do with this.'
MDedge Rheumatology
VA, Kaiser Permanente Aim to Expand Data Exchange Pilot
MDedge Rheumatology