News

Slimming Boomers Could Save Medicare $15 Billion


 

Major Finding: Community-based weight loss programs for individuals aged 60 years or older who are at risk for diabetes or heart disease could save Medicare between $7 billion and $15 billion over the lifetimes of one cohort of baby boomers.

Data Source: Estimates of net savings to Medicare over 10 years and participants' lifetimes.

Disclosures: The authors had no financial disclosures. The Peter G. Peterson Foundation provided assistance for carrying out the research.

ATLANTA – Medicare could be in the position to save between $7 billion and $15 billion over the remaining lifetimes of one cohort of baby boomers if community-based weight loss programs for individuals ages 60 years or older who are at risk for diabetes or heart disease were to be instituted, according to a recent study.

Obesity, defined as body mass index (BMI) of 30 kg/m

“It seems to me that Medicare has an incentive to reach out earlier and improve the health of people who will be coming into the program,” study author, Kenneth E. Thorpe, Ph.D., of Emory University, Atlanta, said in a statement.

Dr. Thorpe and his colleague, Zhou Yang, Ph.D., proposed an evidence-based weight loss program for individuals aged 60-64 who are not yet eligible for Medicare but who are overweight (BMI higher than 24) or obese and at risk for diabetes, cardiovascular disease, or both (Health Affairs 2011 [doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0944]).

Specifically, they suggested expanding an existing community-based weight loss program developed by the CDC, the YMCA of the USA, and UnitedHealth Group, in which trained lifestyle coaches help overweight individuals select healthier foods and increase physical activity. The program is provided by 50 YMCAs and is available at more than 116 sites in 24 states. Studies of this and similar programs show that participants aged 60 years and older lose weight and reduce their risk of developing diabetes by up to 71%.

For the current study, the investigators used 2009 census data to estimate net savings to Medicare over a 10-year period over the lifetime of a single cohort of eligible individuals. Their findings were based on the assumption of participation rates of 70% and 55% of eligible individuals using two enrollment scenarios.

The first scenario would limit enrollment to individuals ages 60-64 who have prediabetes and whose BMI is higher than 24. The cost to enroll 70% of that target group would be about $590 million ($240 per person for 2.6 million participants) but would result in a net savings of $2.3 billion over 10 years and $9.3 billion in net lifetime savings. If 55% of those eligible participated, estimated savings would exceed $1.8 billion over 10 years and $7.3 billion in net lifetime savings.

The second scenario would broaden eligibility to individuals with the same BMI who were at risk for cardiovascular complications (high blood pressure or elevated cholesterol) regardless of whether they had prediabetes. If 70% of eligible patients participate, Medicare would achieve an estimated net savings of $1.4 billion over 10 years and $5.8 billion in net lifetime savings. If 55% of eligible patients participate, the estimated additional net savings to Medicare would be $1.2 billion over 10 years and $4.6 billion over participants' lifetimes.

By extending eligibility to both at-risk groups, the authors estimate that Medicare would save $3 billion to $3.7 billion over the next 10 years and $11.9 to $15.1 billion over participants' lifetimes, depending on the participation rate.

“Our results show the potential savings to Medicare if a proven community-based approach to reducing obesity and related chronic disease were to be made available, nationwide, to high-risk individuals soon to become Medicare beneficiaries,” the researchers said. “In doing so, they also present a potential business case for the federal government to partner with the private sector in order to encourage broad enrollment in effective weight loss programs.”Estimated lifetime savings of $7 billion to $15 billion depend on several factors, such eligibility and participation, they said.

Recommended Reading

MedPAC Looks at Smaller Cuts to Avoid SGR Cliff
MDedge Rheumatology
Obama's Debt Plan Targets Medicare "Overpayments"
MDedge Rheumatology
What's New With Flu? For Doctors, Vaccination by Example
MDedge Rheumatology
Malpractice Concerns Drive Aggressive Care, Say Physicians
MDedge Rheumatology
Policy & Practice : Want more health reform news? Subscribe to our podcast – search 'Policy & Practice' in the iTunes store
MDedge Rheumatology
When Hospitals Hire Docs, Costs Go Up
MDedge Rheumatology
Survey Shows Recession Has Limited Health Care Access
MDedge Rheumatology
Long-Term Meds Get 'Lost' in Hospital Shuffle
MDedge Rheumatology
Profiteers Capitalize on Drug Shortages
MDedge Rheumatology
Part D Premiums Will Decrease in 2012
MDedge Rheumatology