Original Research

Prevalence of Low Bone Mineral Density in Younger Versus Older Women With Distal Radius Fractures

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

Secondary causes of osteoporosis have been documented in 30% of premenopausal women and 55% of men with vertebral fractures.13-15 Primary osteoporosis results from the normal aging process; secondary osteoporosis results from reversible causes, including medications, gastrointestinal disorders, renal disease, endocrine disorders, and sedentary lifestyle.15,16 When a secondary cause of osteoporosis is identified, treatment can be initiated to increase BMD. As younger patients can reverse bone loss and even increase BMD, it is important to identify reversible causes of osteopenia and osteoporosis in this age group. It is well documented that both younger and older patients with DRFs are at increased risk for subsequent fractures.6 Preventing further bone loss at a younger age may drastically decrease lifetime fracture risk.12,17

Most previous studies of BMD in women were limited to patients with DRFs caused by a low-energy mechanism or by a fall from standing. Current recommendations for BMD testing focus on postmenopausal women who have sustained a fragility or low-energy DRF. When an osteoporotic or osteopenic patient’s distal radius is subjected to a high-energy force, a fracture is likely. Therefore, we expanded our study to include high-energy mechanisms of injury. Our analysis of BMD in patients with DRFs sustained in MVCs indicated that 12% of this group were osteoporotic, and 44% were osteopenic. Forty-three percent of our younger patients with a DRF fractured in a MVC were osteopenic, and 6% were osteoporotic. Among 4 mechanisms of injury for DRFs, there was no statistically significant difference in z scores (P = .22) (Figure 2). This provides evidence that a significant portion of patients with DRFs from both high- and low-energy mechanisms are osteoporotic or osteopenic. Patients with DRFs sustained in MVCs or in falls from heights of more than 6 feet should be referred for BMD evaluation.

Conclusion

A significant proportion of younger patients with DRFs are osteopenic or osteoporotic (43% and 6%, respectively), and their z scores are comparable to those of older patients with DRFs. There was no statistically significant difference in BMD z scores between younger and older patients and no difference in mechanisms of injury. This is evidence that younger patients with DRFs caused by a high- or low-energy mechanism of injury should undergo both DXA scan and BMD evaluation. If osteoporosis or osteopenia can be diagnosed at an earlier age, and if these patients can be properly treated, subsequent fractures could be prevented. The present study provides evidence supporting a simplification of the current recommendations for BMD evaluation: All women with DRFs should undergo bone densitometry.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Perilunate Injuries
MDedge Surgery
Sustentaculum Lunatum: Appreciation of the Palmar Lunate Facet in Management of Complex Intra-Articular Fractures of the Distal Radius
MDedge Surgery
Fingertip Amputation Treatment: A Survey Study
MDedge Surgery
Nonoperative Management of Multiple Hand Enchondromas in Ollier Disease With Progressive Ossification
MDedge Surgery
Isolated Radiopalmar Dislocation of Fifth Carpometacarpal Joint: A Rare Presentation
MDedge Surgery
Isolated Avulsion of Extensor Carpi Radialis Longus and Brachioradialis Origins: A Case Report and Surgical Repair Technique
MDedge Surgery
Open Carpal Tunnel Release With Use of a Nasal Turbinate Speculum
MDedge Surgery
Collagenase Enzymatic Fasciotomy for Dupuytren Contracture in Patients on Chronic Immunosuppression
MDedge Surgery
Acute Multiple Flexor Tendon Injury and Carpal Tunnel Syndrome After Open Distal Radius Fracture
MDedge Surgery
Lipoma of the Tendon Sheath in the Fourth Extensor Compartment of the Hand
MDedge Surgery