Clinical Review

The Cruciate Ligaments in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

However, only 80% to 90% of patients are fully satisfied with their implants. The reasons for the dissatisfaction include unexplained anterior knee pain, stiffness, unexplained swelling, loss of range of motion, changes in proprioception, and loss of preoperative functions.14

The mid-term results of the BCR knees that were performed in the 1980s showed similar results to the CR and PS knees. Townley8 reported excellent clinical results with only 2% loosening at 2 to 11 years after surgery. Cloutier and colleagues9 reported 95% survival with improved proprioception at 9 to 11 years after surgery(Table 2).62,63

Studies comparing traditional TKA designs with cruciate preserving designs, both UKA and BCR, have found differences in subjective outcomes.62,64 Comparison of UKA and TKA in the same patient demonstrated significant preference for UKA, particularly with stair-climbing.65 Similarly, comparison between BCR and PS TKA or CR TKA demonstrated preference for BCR in 85% of patients.62

The new BCR knee designs have just started to come to the market.50 The surgical techniques are much improved over the 1980s and cruciate preservation is certainly much easier now. The new designs can produce full range of motion with kinematics that are almost identical to the normal knee in the cadaver laboratory and in computer analyses. These designs certainly should have a similar 20-year survival to the original BCR knees. However, the critical evaluation will be the patient satisfaction scores. With greater motion, better kinematics, and more precise balancing the scores would improve with these designs.

Conclusion

The cruciate ligaments of the knee are central to control of the motion of the normal knee. TKA is a successful operation with at least a 40- to 50-year history. The techniques have continued to develop but 15% to 20% of patients are dissatisfied with the results.14 Evaluations of the prostheses are more sophisticated and kinematics appears to have a central position in the evaluation. If the knee is to move more anatomically correctly, all of the ligaments must be preserved. Proprioception certainly plays a role in the patient’s judgment of the result. History has shown that a BCR knee can be implanted with good mid-term results and it should certainly be possible to build on these results and design a knee that will incorporate all of the ligaments with full range of motion and increased levels of activity.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Partial Flexor Tendon Laceration Assessment: Interobserver and Intraobserver Reliability
MDedge Surgery
New CDC opioid guideline targets overprescribing for chronic pain
MDedge Surgery
How physicians can reverse the opioid crisis
MDedge Surgery
Evaluation of Internet Information About Rotator Cuff Repair
MDedge Surgery
Less symptomatic patients ‘worse off’ after knee surgery
MDedge Surgery
Guideline change advocated on using acetaminophen for OA
MDedge Surgery
Robotic-Assisted Knee Arthroplasty: An Overview
MDedge Surgery
Management of the Biconcave (B2) Glenoid in Shoulder Arthroplasty: Technical Considerations
MDedge Surgery
Single-Bundle, Double-Bundle Techniques Offer Similar Outcomes in ACL Reconstruction
MDedge Surgery
Graft Choice in ACL Reconstruction May Affect Revision Rates
MDedge Surgery