Conference Coverage

ANTARCTIC results chill enthusiasm for platelet monitoring


 

AT THE ESC CONGRESS 2016

Dr. Steen Dalby Kristensen

Dr. Steen Dalby Kristensen

Discussant Steen Dalby Kristensen, MD, noted that ANTARCTIC is just the latest in a slew of negative randomized clinical trials of individualized antiplatelet therapy for coronary artery disease. In addition to ARCTIC, others include GRAVITAS, TRIGGER PCI, and ASCET. One study, the German/Austrian TROPICAL ACS trial, remains ongoing.

“It really is an intriguing concept that many of us have been fascinated by for years: to identify the sweet spot where, by measuring platelet aggregation and maybe changing the therapy, we can find just the right balance between bleeding and ischemia. The ANTARCTIC results are quite disappointing for platelet-monitoring enthusiasts. Is the whole concept wrong?” said Dr. Kristensen, professor of cardiology and head of the cardiovascular research center at Aarhus (Denmark) University Hospital.

“I think even more disappointing for me than the lack of impact on ischemic events was the bleeding. I would have anticipated that maybe bleeding could be avoided by adjusting the dose, but this was not the case,” he added.

But Stephan Gielen, MD, saw a silver lining in the negative results for ANTARCTIC.

“From my perspective as a clinical interventionalist, I’m happy that you ended up in the way you did. Putting things positively, this study confirms the safety of dual-platelet inhibition with prasugrel at the reduced dose of 5 mg in an elderly population. There is no need to go to the trouble of monitoring platelet function even in this elderly population, which I think for clinical practice is a good message,” said Dr. Gielen of Detmold (Germany) Hospital, who cochaired a press conference where Dr. Montalescot presented the ANTARCTIC results.

Simultaneously with Dr. Montalescot’s presentation at ESC 2016 in Rome, the ANTARCTIC results were published online (Lancet. 2016 Aug 26. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31323-X).

ANTARCTIC was funded by Eli Lilly, Daiichi Sankyo, Stentys, Accriva Diagnostics, Medtronic, and the French Foundation for Heart Research. The presenter reported receiving research grants from and/or serving as a consultant to those organizations and numerous others.

bjancin@frontlinemedcom.com

Pages

Recommended Reading

Guideline tweak addresses conflicting recommendations on BAV
MDedge Surgery
Study quantifies volume disparities for ATAD repair in the U.K.
MDedge Surgery
Surgery for acute type A dissection shows 20-year shift to valve sparing, biological valves
MDedge Surgery
Protective hypothermia during arch surgery lacked benefit, study shows
MDedge Surgery
Pediatric autologous aortic repair built to last
MDedge Surgery
Four-branched arch replacement gets acceptable results
MDedge Surgery
Making the case for CABG using bilateral thoracic arteries
MDedge Surgery
Model estimates risk of pneumonia after CABG
MDedge Surgery
Multiarterial grafting survival exceeds conventional CABG, PCI
MDedge Surgery
The new NOACs are generally the best bet
MDedge Surgery

Related Articles