From the Journals

Robotic surgery technologies have unique learning curves for trainees


 

FROM CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS

Training surgeons to use robotic technology involves learning curves, and a study has found that robotic technologies have unique learning curve profiles that have implications for the time and number of procedures needed to achieve competence.

Giorgio Mazzon, MD, of the Institute of Urology at University College Hospital, London, and his colleagues reviewed the literature on training surgeons in the use of a variety of technologies for urological procedures. They analyzed learning curves for virtual reality robotic simulators, robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP), robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC), and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) (Curr Urol Rep. 2017 Sep 23;18:89).

Minimally invasive tobotic durgery with the da Vinci Surgical System. Master Video/Shutterstock
For virtual reality training programs, recommendations for achieving safety and competence is between 4 and 12 hours of training in a simulator. One study showed that surgeons were required to complete 11 basic robotic surgical tasks and 6 advanced tasks. The basic and advanced tasks were completed 89.9% and 75% of the time and within 7 hours and in just over 6 hours, respectively (J Endourol. 2015;29[11]:1289-93).Studies of RALP show that prior experience in open radical prostatectomy improved the learning curve for surgeon RALP performance. One study posited that it only took 50-120 cases for the learning curve to plateau in these surgeons (J Endourol. 2011 Oct 25[10]:1633-7).

RARC learning curves are more rapid than RALP, but this may be due to the fact that most surgeons practice RALP before learning RARC. It is estimated that it takes 21 procedures for operating time to plateau and 30 patients for proper lymph node yield and positive surgical margins of less than 5% to occur (Eur Urol. 2010 Aug;58[2]:197-202).Safety and competence in RAPN is usually defined by operating times, warm ischemic time, positive surgical margin, and complication rates. It has been reported that RAPN can be safely performed with completion of 25-30 cases (Eur Urol. 2010 Jul;58[1]:127-32).The results of the review “should inform trainers and trainees on what outcomes are expected at a given stage of training,” according to the investigators.

They reported no relevant financial disclosures.

Recommended Reading

Robot-assisted surgery: Twice the price
MDedge Surgery
Robot-assisted surgery can be a pain
MDedge Surgery
Confirmatory blood typing unnecessary for closed prolapse repairs
MDedge Surgery
Predicting extraction of an intact uterus in robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy
MDedge Surgery
Robotic-assisted IHR causes fewer complications in obese patients
MDedge Surgery
Clinical trial: Use of robotics for cholecystectomy
MDedge Surgery
Clinical trial: Sinai Robotic Surgery Trial in HPVOPC
MDedge Surgery
Adoption of robotic-assisted surgery uneven across specialties
MDedge Surgery
Peer-to-peer learning about robotic surgery is happening on social media
MDedge Surgery
Robot-assisted prostatectomy providing better outcomes
MDedge Surgery