From the Journals

Allergy, eczema common after pediatric solid organ transplantation

View on the News

Track atopy, allergy in pediatric transplantation

The study is one of several to highlight the occurrence of atopy and allergy following solid organ transplantation in children, Helen M. Evans, MBChB, wrote in an editorial accompanying the report by Marcus et al.

This report differed because it studied the differences in rates of atopy and allergy between transplanted solid organ groups. These occurred in 41% and 40% of liver and heart recipients, respectively, but in only 4% of kidney recipients. Atopy or allergy developed in 57% of multivisceral transplant patients, but the number of patients was very small (n = 7). The majority of the conditions developed within 1 year of transplantation.

The recent spike in these reports could signify better recognition of the problem or “the widespread switch of primary immunosuppression from cyclosporine to tacrolimus over the last few decades,” wrote Dr. Evans.

Most of these reports have been single-center retrospective studies, which are subject to inconsistent case definitions and recall bias, she noted. “The time is right for well-conducted multicenter prospective studies to better inform the true extent of these conditions after solid organ transplantation.”

In the meantime, transplantation centers should routinely track de novo eczema, allergy, and eosinophilic gastrointestinal disease in children being assessed for solid organ transplantation, and should take “rigorous” personal and family histories, said Dr. Evans. Ultimately, this work will help “minimize the risk of children developing these conditions” and “effectively treat them in the setting of immunosuppression after transplantation.”

Dr. Evans is a pediatric gastroenterologist at Starship Child Health in Aukland, New Zealand. She reported having no conflicts of interest. These comments summarize her editorial ( J Pediatr. 2018;196:10-11 ).


 

FROM JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS


Factors that appeared unlinked with PTAA included acute organ rejection, duration of posttransplantation steroidal treatment, organ type (living versus cadaveric), donor/recipient blood type and compatibility, infections besides Epstein-Barr virus, and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease. “The specific type of post-transplantation immunosuppression regimen was neither associated nor protective of PTAA,” the investigators wrote. “However, a significant limitation was our inability to assess the effect of tacrolimus, as nearly all the cohort (97.8%) was treated with this medication.”

Ashley’s Angels fund provided support. The researchers reported having no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Marcus N et al. J Pediatr. 2018;196:154-60.

Pages

Recommended Reading

VIDEO: Prophylaxis for atopic dermatitis
MDedge Surgery
Organ transplant recipients face increased risk of BCC
MDedge Surgery
Bone marrow transplant cures severe HPV disease in GATA2 immunodeficiency
MDedge Surgery
CMS offering educational webinars on MACRA
MDedge Surgery
Perioperative infliximab does not increase serious infection risk
MDedge Surgery
Racial differences in skin cancer risk after organ transplantation
MDedge Surgery
VIDEO: Looking at keloids from a different perspective
MDedge Surgery
Skin cancer risk similar for liver and kidney transplant recipients
MDedge Surgery
Sodium fusidate noninferior to linezolid for acute skin infections
MDedge Surgery
Swedish study finds low risk of developing psoriasis in bariatric surgery patients
MDedge Surgery