Clinical Review

Acetabular Component Revision in Total Hip Arthroplasty. Part I: Cementless Shells

Author and Disclosure Information

Magnitude and location of acetabular bone defects dictate the type of reconstruction required. For the majority of reconstructions, a porous-coated hemispheric shell secured to host bone with multiple screws is the implant of choice. This reconstruction is feasible provided at least 50% of the implant contacts host bone. When such contact is not possible, and there is adequate medial and peripheral bone, techniques using alternative uncemented implants can be used for acetabular reconstruction. An uncemented cup can be placed at a “high hip center.” Alternatively, the acetabular cavity can be progressively reamed to accommodate extra-large cups. Oblong cups, which take advantage of the oval-shaped cavity resulting from many failed acetabular components, can also be used. The success of these cementless techniques depends on the degree and location of bone loss and on the presence of pelvic discontinuity.


 

Recommended Reading

Proximal Tibia Stress Fracture Caused by Severe Arthrosis of the Knee With Varus Deformity
MDedge Surgery
Thromboprophylaxis in Orthopedic Surgery: How Long Is Long Enough?
MDedge Surgery
New Products/Product News
MDedge Surgery
Small-Diameter Percutaneous Decompression for Osteonecrosis of the Shoulder
MDedge Surgery
Intermediate-Term Results With a Modified Antiprotrusio Cage in Acetabular Revision Surgery
MDedge Surgery
Bilateral Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Knees in Monozygotic Twins: The Genetic Factor and Review of the Etiology
MDedge Surgery
Analgesia for Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Review of Lumbar Plexus, Femoral, and Sciatic Nerve Blocks
MDedge Surgery
Blood Cultures for Evaluation of Fever After Total Joint Arthroplasty
MDedge Surgery
Venous Hemodynamic Alterations in Lower Limbs Undergoing Total Joint Arthroplasty
MDedge Surgery
Joint Arthroplasty Within 10 Years After Primary Charnley Total Hip Arthroplasty
MDedge Surgery