Commentary

Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome


 

I enjoyed reading the article “Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome in a Collegiate Soccer Player: A Case Report and Literature Review” by Drs. Farr and Selesnick (Am J Orthop. 2008;37[7]:374-377). However, I do take some exceptions to the authors’ comments.

First, I think the history (supplemented by the usual almost total absence of findings on the exam) is sufficient to justify compartment manometrics without obtaining more costly magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), electromyography/nerve conduction studies (EMG/NCS), and nuclear medicine studies beforehand.

Second, I recommend using an exercise challenge that conforms to what the patient says causes his/her symptoms rather than a “standard” treadmill protocol. For example, I had a patient with the nephrotic syndrome who developed chronic exertional compartment syndrome (CECS) symptoms after walking 75 feet. A fasciotomy resolved her CECS symptoms. A 15-minute run on a treadmill would have likely precipitated a cardiac event. Conversely, I have had college track runners who required 45 minutes of “hard” running before their CECS symptoms were manifested.

Third, I think CECS examiners are remiss in their responsibilities if they do not pair the patient’s subjective perception of pain (using a [0 = no pain] to [10 = excruciating pain] scale) with compartment pressure measurements. This has saved my patients multiple “sticks” with the 19-gauge vented Stryker needles (Stryker Corporation, Kalamazoo, Mich). For example, a recent (markedly obese) patient judged the pain to be 5 (interfered with activities) in the anterior and posterior compartments of both legs after walking for 20 to 30 minutes. At the time of compartment pressure measurements, the symptoms were rated 2 (ie, the patient had to think about them to notice the pain). Resting pressures in the
two compartments were more than twice the upper limits of normal. From this information, I felt comfortable in recommending staged bilateral four-compartment leg fasciotomies while minimizing the needlesticks to two.

I have co-authored an article (with one of my patients, who is now an anesthesiologist and has resumed her half marathon runs after bilateral anterior compartment fasciotomies) which explains how I use perceived pain with manometrics to maximize the decision-making process and minimize the number of “sticks” the patient must experience. (Strauss MB, Wakim N. Patient perception pinpoints exertional leg pain. BioMechanics. 2002;9[10]:63-77.)

Michael B. Strauss, MD
Long Beach, CA

Recommended Reading

Chronic Lateral Ankle Pain Secondary to an Anomalous Peroneus Longus
MDedge Surgery
Eight-Year Follow-Up of Total Knee Arthroplasty in a Patient With an Ipsilateral Below-Knee Amputation
MDedge Surgery
Newly Available, Newly Approved
MDedge Surgery
Patellar Tendon Rupture as a Manifestation of Lyme Disease
MDedge Surgery
Acute Gouty Arthropathy After Total Knee Arthroplasty
MDedge Surgery
Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using a Unique Bioabsorbable Interference Screw for Malpositioned Tunnels
MDedge Surgery
Innovations in the Treatment of Hand and Elbow ArthritisValue-Added Innovation Should Be Responsible and Relevant
MDedge Surgery
Innovations in the Treatment of Hand and Elbow ArthritisTotal Joint Arthroplasty for the Arthritic Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint
MDedge Surgery
Innovations in the Treatment of Hand and Elbow Arthritis. Trapezium-Sparing Options for Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint Arthritis
MDedge Surgery
Innovations in the Treatment of Hand and Elbow Arthritis. Total Wrist Arthroplasty
MDedge Surgery