Evaluation of Autologous Platelet Concentrate for Intertransverse Process Lumbar Fusion
Paul M. Sethi, MD, José J. Miranda, MD, MPH, Sudha Kadiyala, PhD, Tushar Ch. Patel, MD, Manohar Panjabi, PhD, Nancy Troiano, MS, and Gary E. Friedlaender, MD
Dr. Sethi is Sports Medicine Attending, Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery Specialists, Greenwich, Connecticut.
Dr. Miranda is Staff Orthopaedic Surgeon, Womack Army Medical Center, Fort Bragg, North Carolina.
Dr. Kadiyala, is Director, Bone and Spinal Technologies, DePuy AcroMed, Raynham, Massachusetts.
Dr. Patel is Staff Orthopaedic Spine Surgeon, Commonwealth Orthopaedics, Herndon, Virginia.
Dr. Panjabi is Professor, Yale Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, and Director of Biomechanics Laboratory, New Haven, Connecticut.
Ms. Troiano is Histotechnologist, Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Dr. Friedlaender is Wayne O. Southwick Professor and Chairman, Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Data on the role of platelet concentrate (PC) in spinal fusion are limited. Using the New Zealand white rabbit model, we compared fusion rates at L5–L6 using 2 different volumes (1.5 cm3, 3.0 cm3) of iliac crest autograft with and without PC (4 groups total, 10 animals in each). PC was collected from donor rabbits and adjusted to a concentration of 1x106 platelets/mL. Bone growth and fusion were evaluated using biomechanical, radiographic, and histologic testing. At 1.5 cm3, autograft alone had a 29% fusion rate, compared with autograft plus PC, which had a 57% fusion rate (P = .06). At 3.0 cm3, the fusion rate approached 90% in both groups. Radiologic fusion had a 70% correlation with biomechanical test results. Huo/Friedlaender scores were 4.3 (SD, 2.9) for 1.5-cm3 autograft alone; 5.0 (SD, 3.5) for 1.5-cm3 autograft plus PC; 4.7 (SD, 2.5) for 3.0-cm3autograft alone; and 7.7 (SD, 0.6) for 3.0-cm3 autograft plus PC. For 1.5-cm3 autograft, a trend toward improvement in biomechanically defined fusion was found when PC was added, which suggests that, when the amount of bone graft is limited, PC may function as a graft extender in posterolateral fusion. At higher volumes of bone graft, no appreciable difference was noted between groups. Although radiography revealed fusion masses, the technique was not useful in identifying pseudarthrosis. On histologic analysis, adding PC seemed to result in more mature bone at both volumes, with the most mature bone in the group with 3.0-cm3 autograft plus PC.