Article

Treatment of Open Periarticular Shoulder Fractures Sustained in Combat-Related Injuries

Author and Disclosure Information

Open periarticular shoulder fractures present a tremendous challenge for orthopedic surgeons. These injuries, albeit rare, are typically caused by high-energy mechanisms and are associated with insult to multiple organ systems resulting in high morbidity and mortality. Although the civilian trauma literature includes several articles on outcomes of closed periarticular shoulder fractures, only 1 peer-reviewed article has focused on this specific open injury pattern. No standard management technique has been adopted for these injuries, and treatment patterns have anecdotally evolved from war to war.

In this article, we review evacuation of patients, management of combat-related open periarticular shoulder injuries, and the pertinent literature; we supplement this review with a description of the recent experience of Drs. HMF and WCD. All cases of combat-related open fractures treated at our institution between March 2003 and January 2007 were reviewed. We identified 44 patients with open periarticular shoulder fractures (33 IIIA, 1 IIIB, 10 IIIC). Inpatient and outpatient medical records, x-rays, laboratory culture data, and photographic documentation records were reviewed. Mean follow-up was 34 months (range, 12-49 months). Rates of associated neurologic and vascular injury were 41% (18/44 patients), and 23% (10/44 patients), respectively. Other associated significant injuries occurred in 38/44 patients (86%). Internal fixation was used as definitive treatment in 26/44 patients (59%). Radiographic union occurred by a mean of 4.5 months (range, 3-9 months) after surgery. Postoperative deep infection/osteomyelitis occurred in 5/35 patients (14%) with more than 1-year follow-up data available. The overall amputation rate was 9%.

Open combat-related periarticular shoulder fractures are complicated injuries, often associated with several traumatic comorbidities that together present difficult challenges to treatment. Meticulous surgical débridement is essential in managing these severely comminuted and contaminated open fractures. In cases in which internal fixation is used, careful timing and patient selection are required to minimize risk for osteomyelitis. Data collection is being continued in this patient cohort to allow for eventual reporting of functional outcomes.


 

Recommended Reading

Percutaneous Fixation of the Medial Condyle in Bicondylar Tibial Plateau Fractures: Novel Use of the 3.5-mm Medial Distal Tibia Plate
MDedge Surgery
Preoperative Cardiac Evaluation of Patients With Acute Hip Fracture
MDedge Surgery
Delayed Diagnosis of a Flexion-Distraction (Seat Belt) Injury in a Patient With Multiple Abdominal Injuries: A Case Report
MDedge Surgery
Management of Late Posttraumatic Kyphosis With Anterior Z-Plate Instrumentation
MDedge Surgery
Surgical Reconstruction of a Late-Presenting Volar Radiocarpal Dislocation
MDedge Surgery
Two Cases of Missed Salter-Harris III Coronal Plane Fracture of the Lateral Femoral Condyle
MDedge Surgery
Delayed Rupture of the Flexor Pollicis Longus Tendon After Routine Volar Placement of a T-Plate on the Distal Radius
MDedge Surgery
A Biomechanical Study of Simulated Femoral Neck Fracture Fixation by Cannulated Screws: Effects of Placement Angle and Number of Screws
MDedge Surgery
Bilateral Luxatio Erecta Humeri and Bilateral Knee Dislocations in the Same Patient
MDedge Surgery
Connecting Multiple Open Wounds to a Single Negative-Pressure Dressing
MDedge Surgery