Original Research

The Pros and Cons of Using Larger Femoral Heads in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Author and Disclosure Information

With the introduction of improved bearing surfaces for total hip arthroplasty (THA) has come a reintroduction of larger femoral heads with the promise of reducing the rate of hip instability and increasing hip range of motion (ROM). The size of femoral heads used for THA ranges from 22 to 40 mm, and even larger heads are used for hip resurfacing. With accurately positioned components, larger heads reduce the hip instability rate and theoretically increase hip ROM. However, for any given bearing surface, the volumetric wear rate is higher for larger heads than for smaller heads, which potentially jeopardizes the long-term survival of these reconstructions. In this article, we review the evidence for use of larger femoral heads with respect to stability, ROM, impingement, wear rate, bearing surfaces, and future directions.


 

Recommended Reading

FDA approves denosumab for giant cell tumors
MDedge Surgery
Physical Examination and Radiographic Interpretation of Carpal Anatomy in Orthopedic Residents and Emergency Medicine Physicians
MDedge Surgery
Accuracy of Detecting Screw Penetration of the Radiocarpal Joint Following Volar Plating Using Plain Radiographs Versus Computed Tomography
MDedge Surgery
Isolated Laceration to the Deep Motor Branch of the Ulnar Nerve by a Retained Foreign Body
MDedge Surgery
Closed Sagittal Band Injury Due to Low Energy Trauma
MDedge Surgery
Hypothenar Hammer Syndrome
MDedge Surgery
Edward Diao, MD
MDedge Surgery
Type IIb Bony Mallet Finger: Is Anatomical Reduction of the Fracture Necessary?
MDedge Surgery
Cartilage Defect of Lunate Facet of Distal Radius After Fracture Treated With Osteochondral Autograft From Knee
MDedge Surgery
High-Pressure Paint Gun Injection Injury to the Palm
MDedge Surgery