News

Robot-assisted radical cystectomy doesn’t cut complications


 

FROM THE NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE

References

Compared with open radical cystectomy, robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy did not reduce the number or severity of complications among patients with bladder cancer enrolled in a single-center randomized clinical trial, according to a letter to the editor in the New England Journal of Medicine.

Retrospective studies have suggested that the robot-assisted laparoscopic approach reduces the complication rate and shortens the length of hospitalization in patients with bladder cancer, many of whom are older, are smokers, and have coexisting conditions. This trial was designed to compare that approach against open radical cystectomy, with both procedures using extracorporeal urinary diversion, in 118 patients who had stage Ta-3N0-3M0 bladder cancer, said Dr. Bernard H. Bochner and his associates at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York.

Courtesy Wikimedia Commons/Nimur/Creative Commons

The rate of complications of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgeries (grade 2-5) was 62%, compared to 66% for open surgeries.

The primary outcome – the rate of complications of grade 2-5 within 90 days of surgery—was 62% (37 of 60 patients) with robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery, which was not significantly different from the 66% rate (38 of 58 patients) with open surgery. Similarly, the rates of high-grade complications were not significantly different (22% vs 21%), and the mean length of hospitalization was identical (8 days) in both groups. The amount of intraoperative blood loss was smaller with the robot-assisted surgery (mean difference, 159 cc), but the duration of surgery was shorter with open surgery (mean difference, 127 minutes).

"Because the trial was performed by experienced surgeons at a single, high-volume referral center, the results may not be generalizable to all clinical settings. Nonetheless, these results highlight the need for randomized trials to inform the benefits and risks of new surgical technologies before widespread implementation," Dr. Bochner and his associates said (N. Engl. J. Med. 2014;371:389-90).

This work was supported by the Sidney Kimmel Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Pin Down Bladder Cancer, and the Michael A. and Zena Wiener Research and Therapeutics Program in Bladder Cancer. Dr. Bochner and his associates reported no financial conflicts of interest.

Recommended Reading

Postop surveillance sufficient for stage I testicular cancer
MDedge Surgery
Consequences of not screening for prostate cancer prove dire
MDedge Surgery
New test beats PSA in predicting significant prostate Ca
MDedge Surgery
Prostatectomy follow-up guidelines released
MDedge Surgery
Prolaris test eyed as predictor of prostate cancer outcomes
MDedge Surgery
Prostate cancer stage has declined more than Gleason score
MDedge Surgery
ASTRO outlines five radiation oncology practices that should be curtailed
MDedge Surgery
CDC sounds alarm on hospital antibiotic use
MDedge Surgery
Positive surgical margins do not independently predict prostate cancer mortality
MDedge Surgery
Specialists drive overtreatment of low-risk prostate cancer
MDedge Surgery