Commentary

Commentary to "5 Points on Total Ankle Arthroplasty"

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

There are considerable differences in the design and implantation technique of the current total ankle implants available in the United States, eg, mobile vs. fixed bearing, intramedullary vs. extramedullary guidance, anterior vs. lateral surgical approach, flat vs. curved bone cuts, natural articular design with minimal bone resection (Zimmer Trabecular Metal Total Ankle; Zimmer, Warsaw, Indiana) vs. larger implant construct with more bone resection (Inbone II; Figure 2). There is no evidence that one implant design is superior, and, as the authors conclude, “Direct comparisons between TAA [total ankle arthroplasty] implant systems are needed to determine what clinical benefits are achieved with each design and what contributes to these differences.”

Hsu AR, Anderson RB, Cohen BE. Total Ankle Arthroplasty. Am J Orthop. 2014;43(10):451-457.

Recommended Reading

Displaced Ischial Stress Fracture Following Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
MDedge Surgery
Knee Surgery Not Necessary for Middle-Aged Patients with Mild Osteoarthritis
MDedge Surgery
Zorvolex® Approved by FDA for Treatment of Osteoarthritis Pain
MDedge Surgery
Advanced Technology Reveals Tiny Strains in Body Tissue Pre-Injury
MDedge Surgery
Pro Baseball Pitchers’ Missed Days Attributed to Weak Core
MDedge Surgery
Biodegradable Surgical Pin Could Also Promote Bone Growth
MDedge Surgery
Patellofemoral Crepitation and Clunk Complicating Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty
MDedge Surgery
Effect of Acetabular Cup Abduction Angle on Wear of Ultrahigh-Molecular-Weight Polyethylene in Hip Simulator Testing
MDedge Surgery
Conversion of Cephalomedullary Nail Fixation to Hip Arthroplasty: Technical Points and Pitfalls
MDedge Surgery
5 Points on Total Ankle Arthroplasty
MDedge Surgery