“As far as the other variables – Graves disease, the size of the tumor, some people would also argue smoking and poorly controlled hypertension – it really becomes a conversation between the surgeon and the patient to know how reliable is the patient, how do you feel the operation went. … Hopefully, the next step is being able to find a way to weigh these different factors to be able to figure out, well, if my patient has A, B, and C, I must observe versus if they don’t, this might be somebody I can send home.”
Another attendee asked, “How do you [handle] aspirin use, given that it’s low risk as seen in your data set? How do you preop the patients, [do you] ask them to stop any low-risk agents, such as aspirin, or if they take the combination of aspirin and Plavix, which one do you hold and which do you continue in your practice?”
“After kind of combing through this data and becoming very familiar with it, I feel very comfortable with continuing aspirin use through the perioperative period,” Dr. Oltmann commented.
“For Plavix, obviously, you just have to juggle the risk-benefit ratio of why they are on that medication,” she said. “I think the most compelling situation is for our patients with atrial fibrillation, with the primary care provider wanting to … have them done on a Lovenox [enoxaparin] bridge, and now having some sort of objective data to get back with them and say, ‘Listen, they have an 11% risk of this really bad complication. Do you really think their risk of stroke trumps that?’ In most patients, that’s not the case, and I think [these data are] finally going to be able to give us some ammunition in that particular battle.”
Dr. Oltmann disclosed that she had no relevant conflicts of interest.