News

Surgical wound classification unreliable


 

References

Surgical wound classification is frequently unreliable, according to a multicenter review of 2,034 cases.

Overall concordance between surgical wound classification (SWC) from the electronic medical record and SWC from operative note review was only 56%, ranging from 47% to 66% across 11 participating institutions.

The degree of discordance also varied according to the specific operation, with inguinal hernia repair having the highest overall median concordance at 92% and appendectomy having the lowest at just 12%.

“Using unreliable measures, such as current SWC assignment methods, can lead to biased study results and misleading portrayals of hospital quality. Surgical wound classification should not be used for SSI [surgical site infection] risk stratification until a more consistent process can be developed and validated,” Dr. Shauna M. Levy, lead study author, concluded.

Read the full article: J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2015;220;323-9.

Recommended Reading

Feds: ACA enrollment extended for some
MDedge Surgery
Certified ACS trauma centers move the dial on patient outcomes
MDedge Surgery
CMS delays overpayment reporting rule
MDedge Surgery
Feds open ACA special enrollment period during tax season
MDedge Surgery
Medical societies again call for gun law changes
MDedge Surgery
FDA approves adhesive treatment for superficial varicose veins
MDedge Surgery
Report: Newly insured patients won’t strain health system
MDedge Surgery
CMS extends 2014 Medicare meaningful use attestation deadline
MDedge Surgery
Supreme Court’s ruling could jeopardize state medical board regulation
MDedge Surgery
Patient Satisfaction as a Metric for Quality
MDedge Surgery