Tips

Retrograde Reamer/Irrigator/Aspirator Technique for Autologous Bone Graft Harvesting With the Patient in the Prone Position

Author and Disclosure Information

In recent years, the Reamer/Irrigator/Aspirator (RIA) system (Synthes, West Chester, Pennsylvania) has emerged as an extremely effective alternative in harvesting large volumes of autologous bone graft through reaming of the femoral intramedullary canal. The technique has been described in the literature as using an antegrade approach to the femur with the patient in the supine or prone position. It has also been described as a retrograde approach in the supine position.

In this article, we describe a new technique—a retrograde femoral approach with the patient in the prone position. This technique allows for more efficient preparation by eliminating the need to reposition, reprepare, and redrape the extremity, thus decreasing operative time and risk of infection. Although we present this technique for use in ankle and hindfoot arthrodesis, we think it can be valuable in any prone-position procedure, including spine surgery.


 

References

The Reamer/Irrigator/Aspirator (RIA) system (Synthes, West Chester, Pennsylvania) has become a powerful tool for harvesting autologous bone graft from the intramedullary canal of the long bones of the lower extremity for the treatment of osseous defects, nonunions, and joint fusions.1,2 The RIA system provides satisfactory quality and quantity of bone graft (range, 40-90 mL)3-5 with osteogenic properties that rival those harvested from the iliac crest.6,7 Minimal donor-site morbidity and mortality have been reported in association with the RIA technique compared with iliac crest bone graft harvest.8

The RIA technique for the femur—with the antegrade approach and the supine position,8 with the antegrade approach and the prone position,9 and with the retrograde approach and the supine position4—has been described in the literature. To our knowledge, however, the RIA technique for the femur with the retrograde approach and the prone position has not been described. Antegrade harvesting uses the trochanteric entry point, and retrograde harvesting uses an entry at the intercondylar notch just anterior to the posterior cruciate ligament. In this article, we detail the technique for RIA harvesting of the femur with the patient in the prone position. Patient positioning is based on the diagnosis and the proposed procedure.

Advantages of a retrograde starting point include a more concentric trajectory (vs that of an antegrade starting point) and more efficient canal pressure reduction, which might decrease the risk of intraoperative fat embolization.10 This technique offers a more efficient solution to any procedure that requires the prone position, and it avoids the need to reposition, reprepare, or redrape the extremity. It is also very useful in treating obese patients.

After obtaining institutional review board (IRB) approval, we retrospectively reviewed patient files. Because the study was retrospective, the IRB waived the requirement for informed consent. The patients described here provided written informed consent for print and electronic publication of these case reports.

Surgical Technique

The patient is placed in a prone position on a radiolucent table with a bump under the thigh to allow access to the knee joint with full extension of the hip (Figures 1, 2A, 2B). The knee is then flexed to gain access to the intercondylar notch.

The anatomical axis of the femur is identified in the coronal and sagittal planes with the help of an image intensifier. Frequent intraoperative fluoroscopic imaging is required to prevent eccentric reaming and guide-wire movement from causing iatrogenic fractures and perforations, respectively.8 A 2-mm Steinmann pin is used to identify the point of entry into the femoral canal, which is located just above the posterior cruciate ligament insertion in the intercondylar notch, and care is taken not to ream this structure. A minimally invasive incision of about 15 mm is centered on this pin using a patellar tendon–splitting approach.

An 8-mm cannulated anterior cruciate ligament reamer is passed over the pin to enlarge the opening at the entry point, and a 2.5-mm ball-tipped guide wire is positioned in the femur. The image intensifier is used to confirm positioning of the guide in the trochanteric region and centered in the intramedullary canal. A radiolucent diving board facilitates fluoroscopic imaging.

The diameter (12.5 or 16.5 mm) of the reaming head is selected after the intramedullary guide is placed in the femoral canal. The isthmus of the femur is then identified radiographically, and a radiopaque ruler with increments in millimeters is used to measure the canal diameter (Figures 3A, 3B). Because the femoral canal is an ellipsoid, the canal diameter usually is much larger anteroposteriorly than laterally.8 We prefer to use a reaming head that overlaps the inner cortical diameter by 1 mm on each side. An alternative method includes measuring the outer diameter of the narrowest portion of the bone and using a reamer head no more than 45% of the outer diameter at the isthmus.8

The RIA system is prepared on the back table by attaching the reaming head to the irrigation and suction systems. As the reamer head enters the intramedullary canal, an approach–withdraw–pause technique is used to slowly advance the reamer through the femur. It is crucial to use the image intensifier to guide reaming in order to avoid overdrilling the anterior cortex and prevent eccentric reaming of the canal, which more commonly occurs in patients with large anterior femoral bows.11 When the collection filter becomes full, reaming is stopped. The bone graft in the filter is emptied into a specimen cup for measurement and storage until subsequent use (Figure 4). Suctioning is suspended when reaming is stopped because substantial blood loss can occur with prolonged suction and aspiration.12 When repeat reaming is required, care is taken not to overream the cortices, thereby avoiding the risk of iatrogenic fracture.10,12

Pages

Recommended Reading

The Biologic Holy Grail: Will It Ever Be Found?
MDedge Surgery
An Innovative Approach to Concave-Convex Allograft Junctions: A Biomechanical Study
MDedge Surgery
The "Holy Grail," Where Do We Go From Here?
MDedge Surgery
Measurement of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Angles in Single-Bundle Reconstruction Using the Anteromedial Portal
MDedge Surgery
Cost Estimates of Biologic Implants Among Orthopedic Surgeons
MDedge Surgery
The Applications of Biologics in Orthopedic Surgery
MDedge Surgery
Analysis of Intermediate Outcomes of Glenoid Bone Grafting in Revision Shoulder Arthroplasty
MDedge Surgery
Glenoid Damage From Articular Protrusion of Metal Suture Anchor After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
MDedge Surgery
Nanotechnology: Why Should We Care?
MDedge Surgery
Emerging Biologics in Orthopedics
MDedge Surgery