Letters To The Editor

In reply: Menopausal hormone therapy

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

In Reply: We would like to thank Dr. Thacker for her interest in our article on the clinical considerations regarding optimal duration of hormone therapy. 1 We agree that the simple answer to whether there is there a time limit for systemic menopausal hormone therapy is no, emphasizing an individualized approach to each patient. After appropriate counseling and shared decision-making, some women may elect a short duration of therapy while others prefer longer-term use.

As Dr. Thacker mentioned, Mikkola et al 2 performed an observational study of more than 300,000 Finnish women who discontinued hormone therapy. Data on the number of deaths in this group were gathered from a national database and compared with the expected number of deaths in the background population; 30% of the listed causes of death were confirmed by autopsy. In women who had started hormone therapy before age 60, the risk of cardiac death was elevated within the first year after stopping it (standardized mortality ratio [SMR] 1.74; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.37–2.19), as was the risk of stroke (SMR 2.59, 95% CI 2.08–3.19). This was not true in women who started hormone therapy at age 60 and older. These findings are consistent with our contemporary understanding that for many women younger than age 60 the benefits of hormone therapy outweigh the risks.

The study had several important limitations:

  • A healthy-woman bias may have contributed to the reduction in cardiovascular risk.
  • No dates for the myocardial infarctions or strokes were available, and the dates hormone therapy was discontined potentially had a 3-month error.
  • No data were available on important confounding factors such as smoking, body mass index, blood pressure, lipid levels, and family history.
  • Hormone therapy users were compared with an age-standardized background population, which also included hormone therapy users.
  • Long-term follow-up data were also perplexing: although more women than expected died of stroke or coronary heart disease within the first year of stopping hormone therapy, after 1 year, significantly fewer women died of these conditions than expected, regardless of how long they had been on hormone therapy before stopping.

These observations highlight the need for long-term, randomized, prospective controlled studies that adequately assess all long-term outcomes (cardiovascular events, mortality, cancer, fracture) in women who initiate hormone therapy before age 60 and within 10 years of menopause, including long-term follow-up after discontinuation. Though future randomized controlled trials will be beneficial to help guide women to a more balanced understanding of long-term hormone therapy and the risks of discontinuation, the current evidence supports continuing hormone therapy in women who derive a net benefit.

Recommended Reading

Type 2 diabetes in youth needs new treatment options
Type 2 Diabetes ICYMI
Pharmacists urge more focus on kidney disease indicator
Type 2 Diabetes ICYMI
Early menopause a risk factor for type 2 diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes ICYMI
Risk tool labels 59%-81% of adults as prediabetic
Type 2 Diabetes ICYMI
Diabetes, stroke linked to recurrent C. difficile
Type 2 Diabetes ICYMI
Drug-induced weight gain: Rethinking our choices
Type 2 Diabetes ICYMI
Which patients with metabolic syndrome benefit from metformin?
Type 2 Diabetes ICYMI
Early menopause a risk factor for type 2 diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes ICYMI
Resorbable scaffold appears safe, effective in diabetes patients
Type 2 Diabetes ICYMI
Some Patients With Diabetes Aren’t Getting Needed Weight Advice
Type 2 Diabetes ICYMI

Related Articles