From the Journals

Intravenous antiemetic combination is well tolerated


 

FROM ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY

An intravenous combination of fosnetupitant and palonosetron is as well tolerated as is the oral combination for the management of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, according to a double-blind phase 3 study.

Researchers randomized 404 chemotherapy-naive patients undergoing highly emetogenic chemotherapy for solid tumors to receive a single intravenous dose of 235 mg fosnetupitant and 0.25 mg palonosetron (NEPA) 30 minutes before chemotherapy, or an oral formulation 60 minutes before chemotherapy, with matching placebos.

After a mean of 3.3 doses of intravenous formulation or 3.2 doses of oral formulation, there were similar numbers of treatment-emergent adverse events in the intravenous and oral groups (83.3% vs. 86.6%) but no serious treatment-related adverse events, the investigators wrote. The report was published in Annals of Oncology.

Nearly half of patients in both groups experienced severe adverse events over the course of the study, the most common being neutropenia, anemia, and leukopenia. The most common overall adverse events that occurred during the course of treatment were constipation and increased alanine aminotransferase.

There were very few infusion site treatment-emergent adverse events and none of these were judged to be related to the intravenous infusion of the drug combination.

“Infusion site reactions have been reported for fosaprepitant and IV rolapitant and the product labeling for both includes precaution/warning statements regarding the potential for hypersensitivity reactions/anaphylaxis; in addition, marketed distribution of IV rolapitant was recently suspended as a result of anaphylaxis/anaphylactic shock and hypersensitivity reactions reported in the post-marketing setting,” wrote Lee Schwartzberg, MD, of West Cancer Center, Germantown, Tenn., and his coauthors.

“In light of this, it is noteworthy that there were no injection site reactions considered to be related to IV NEPA over repeated cycles and no instance of anaphylaxis with either formulation of NEPA,” they wrote.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Analgesic management in radiation oncology for painful bone metastases
Breast Cancer ICYMI
Gaps exist in receipt of clinically indicated genetic counseling after breast cancer diagnosis
Breast Cancer ICYMI
Late toxicities with PARP inhibitor plus RT in inflammatory breast cancer
Breast Cancer ICYMI
Over one-third report financial burden from breast cancer treatment
Breast Cancer ICYMI
21-gene assay predicts survival in male and female breast cancer
Breast Cancer ICYMI
Sarcopenia, body fat linked with mortality in nonmetastatic breast cancer
Breast Cancer ICYMI
Hormone therapy raises diabetes risk in breast cancer survivors
Breast Cancer ICYMI
Early breast cancer: Patients report favorable quality of life after partial breast irradiation
Breast Cancer ICYMI
Integrating survivorship care planning in radiation oncology workflow
Breast Cancer ICYMI
Novel targeted cancer drugs cause fewer arrhythmias
Breast Cancer ICYMI