News

FDA approves cangrelor, an intravenous antiplatelet drug


 

References

But the editorial that accompanied the 2013 publication highlighted what the editorialists perceived as flaws in the study’s design, such as an inadequate loading dose of clopidogrel delivered to a quarter of the patients randomized to that arm, inadequate time allowed for the clopidogrel to fully kick in before PCI began in a third of patients, and the use of clopidogrel as the comparator drug and not a more potent alternative drug, either prasugrel or ticagrelor (N. Engl. J. Med. 2013;368:1356-7).

“Cangrelor was never tested against prasugrel or ticagrelor, and it was compared with inadequate clopidogrel treatment. That was a problem,” reiterated Dr. Richard A. Lange, one of the 2013 editorialists, when interviewed following news of cangrelor’s FDA approval. CHAMPION PHOENIX “wasn’t really a comparison [of two drugs], it was a study of an intravenous strategy, and it’s not a strategy that is needed very often,” said Dr. Lange, an interventional cardiologist and president of the Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center in El Paso. In Dr. Lange’s opinion, the only real need for an intravenous ADP-receptor antagonist is for CAD patients undergoing PCI who are unable to take an oral agent, for example because they are on a ventilator, unable to hold down an oral pill, or unconscious, which collectively are “rare” situations, he said.

Dr. Bhatt noted that another clear indication for an intravenous agent is when MI patients receive morphine for their pain, a situation recently documented to interfere with absorption of oral ADP-receptor antagonists.

From Dr. Bhatt’s perspective, the major issue is practice patterns: “Do the interventionalists treat [with an ADP-receptor antagonist] upstream or not. If they do, then they should do the math,” and determine if the expense of holding a significant minority of patients in the hospital just to allow them to clear the ADP-receptor antagonist prior to coronary bypass surgery outweighs the cost for delaying this treatment and administering cangrelor later only to patients scheduled for PCI. At the center where he practices, Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, he sees a roughly equal mix of interventionalists who prefer to treat patients with clopidogrel upfront, those who treat with ticagrelor upfront, and those who practice as he does and wait until the PCI is a go.

“For my personal practice, cangrelor will fit in quite nicely,” Dr. Bhatt said.

mzoler@frontlinemedcom.com

On Twitter@mitchelzoler

Pages

Recommended Reading

Traditional diagnostic criteria miss OSA in coronary artery disease patients
MDedge Cardiology
TAVI embolic protection device shows favorable safety, efficacy
MDedge Cardiology
EuroPCR: Which TAVI vascular closure device is safest?
MDedge Cardiology
EuroPCR: New Sapien 3 TAVI valve findings show ‘wow’ factor
MDedge Cardiology
EuroPCR: OCT stenting guidance may decrease MIs
MDedge Cardiology
Decompressive brain surgery carries high complication risk
MDedge Cardiology
European cardiologists seek involvement in acute stroke
MDedge Cardiology
New tools aid decisions on length of dual-antiplatelet therapy
MDedge Cardiology
Erectile dysfunction: New frontier in interventional cardiology
MDedge Cardiology
Perioperative factors influenced open TAAA repair
MDedge Cardiology

Related Articles