Conference Coverage

ANTARCTIC results chill enthusiasm for platelet monitoring


 

AT THE ESC CONGRESS 2016

Dr. Steen Dalby Kristensen

Dr. Steen Dalby Kristensen

Discussant Steen Dalby Kristensen, MD, noted that ANTARCTIC is just the latest in a slew of negative randomized clinical trials of individualized antiplatelet therapy for coronary artery disease. In addition to ARCTIC, others include GRAVITAS, TRIGGER PCI, and ASCET. One study, the German/Austrian TROPICAL ACS trial, remains ongoing.

“It really is an intriguing concept that many of us have been fascinated by for years: to identify the sweet spot where, by measuring platelet aggregation and maybe changing the therapy, we can find just the right balance between bleeding and ischemia. The ANTARCTIC results are quite disappointing for platelet-monitoring enthusiasts. Is the whole concept wrong?” said Dr. Kristensen, professor of cardiology and head of the cardiovascular research center at Aarhus (Denmark) University Hospital.

“I think even more disappointing for me than the lack of impact on ischemic events was the bleeding. I would have anticipated that maybe bleeding could be avoided by adjusting the dose, but this was not the case,” he added.

But Stephan Gielen, MD, saw a silver lining in the negative results for ANTARCTIC.

“From my perspective as a clinical interventionalist, I’m happy that you ended up in the way you did. Putting things positively, this study confirms the safety of dual-platelet inhibition with prasugrel at the reduced dose of 5 mg in an elderly population. There is no need to go to the trouble of monitoring platelet function even in this elderly population, which I think for clinical practice is a good message,” said Dr. Gielen of Detmold (Germany) Hospital, who cochaired a press conference where Dr. Montalescot presented the ANTARCTIC results.

Simultaneously with Dr. Montalescot’s presentation at ESC 2016 in Rome, the ANTARCTIC results were published online (Lancet. 2016 Aug 26. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31323-X).

ANTARCTIC was funded by Eli Lilly, Daiichi Sankyo, Stentys, Accriva Diagnostics, Medtronic, and the French Foundation for Heart Research. The presenter reported receiving research grants from and/or serving as a consultant to those organizations and numerous others.

bjancin@frontlinemedcom.com

Pages

Recommended Reading

Using transcatheter aortic valves for severe mitral annular calcification
MDedge Cardiology
Model estimates risk of pneumonia after CABG
MDedge Cardiology
Gallstone disease boosts heart disease risk
MDedge Cardiology
Multiarterial grafting survival exceeds conventional CABG, PCI
MDedge Cardiology
VIDEO: Moderate LDL, SBP reductions slash cardiovascular events 90% over time
MDedge Cardiology
VIDEO: Functional noninvasive imaging cuts unnecessary angiography
MDedge Cardiology
ENSURE-AF trial supports edoxaban for electrical cardioversion
MDedge Cardiology
VIDEO: Coronary DES outperform BMS mostly on restenosis
MDedge Cardiology
The new NOACs are generally the best bet
MDedge Cardiology
Ticagrelor slashes first stroke risk after MI
MDedge Cardiology

Related Articles