From the Journals

ICYMI: Wearable cardioverter-defibrillator ineffective at reducing arrhythmic death risk


 

FROM NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE

Patients who recently experienced an MI and had an ejection fraction of 35% or less who used a wearable cardioverter-defibrillator had no decreased risk of arrhythmic death, compared with people who did not use a wearable cardioverter-defibrillator, according to an analysis of data from the multicenter, randomized, and controlled VEST trial (NCT01446965). The results were published Sept. 26 in the New England Journal of Medicine (doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800781).

We covered this story before it was published in the journal. Find our conference coverage at the links below.


Recommended Reading

New look at ATLAS suggests rivaroxaban may still have role in ACS
MDedge Cardiology
ICD use curbed in hospitals named in federal lawsuit
MDedge Cardiology
mSToPS breaks ground as a ‘pragmatic’ randomized trial
MDedge Cardiology
Patch-based AF screening boosts diagnosis rate
MDedge Cardiology
DOACs found safer than warfarin in the real world
MDedge Cardiology
New Valsalva maneuver for SVT beats all others
MDedge Cardiology
New MI definition aims to better distinguish infarction from injury
MDedge Cardiology
Spurring innovation in digital health
MDedge Cardiology
Expert panel updates guidelines on antithrombotic therapy for AF
MDedge Cardiology
Atrial fib guidelines may fall short on oral anticoagulation
MDedge Cardiology