From the Journals

Cardiovascular risk score multipliers suggested for rheumatic diseases


 

FROM ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES

Determining cardiovascular risk

Dr. Conrad and associates in their viewpoint article suggested that an update to the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology guidelines for cardiovascular risk management of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) could tailor cardiovascular risk scores to certain diseases.

They suggested that the guidelines could consider a risk multiplier of 2.5 for systemic sclerosis, 2.0 for lupus, and 1.5 for any other rheumatic disease.

“We argue that [EULAR] recommendations should consider this new evidence of poorer cardiovascular health in numerous RMDs and envisage cardiovascular screening and associated prevention measures,” Dr. Conrad said.

While they recognize that risk multipliers aren’t perfect, “they are the best available option until personalized risk prediction tools are developed specifically for patients with RMDs.”

Addressing cardiovascular risk

As a former president of EULAR, Dr. McInnes was keen to point out that “EULAR’s recommendations are evidence based and are rigorously built on [standard operating procedures] that work and have stood the test of time. I’m quite sure that the members of relevant EULAR task forces will be looking at these data, but they’ll be looking at the whole range of literature to see whether change is necessary.”

Good-quality inflammatory disease control will certainly contribute to reducing vascular risk, “but we should not make the assumption that it will be sufficient,” he cautioned. “We still have to be very careful in addressing so called conventional risk factors, but in particular thinking about obesity and cardiometabolic syndrome to be sure that when those are present, that we detect them and we treat them appropriately.”

As to who is best placed to manage a patient’s cardiovascular risk profile, Dr. McInnes said: “I think the rheumatologist has a responsibility to make sure that as much of the patient’s disease spectrum is being treated as possible.”

“As a rheumatologist, I would like to know that those elements of a patient’s disease presentation are being addressed,” whether that is by a primary care physician, cardiologist, diabetologist, or other specialist involved in the optimal management of the patient.

Dr. Conrad acknowledged receiving support from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Program, the European Society for Cardiology, and grant funding paid to her institution from the Belgian-based Research Foundation Flounders. She also acknowledged receipt of royalties in regard to the intellectual property of a home-monitoring system for heart failure paid to Oxford University Innovation. Dr. McInnes acknowledged financial relationships with many pharmaceutical companies.

*This article was updated 12/30/2022.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Arthritis drug may curb myocardial damage in acute STEMI
MDedge Cardiology
Tocilizumab shortage continues as pandemic wears on
MDedge Cardiology
Statins’ effects on CVD outweigh risk for diabetes in RA
MDedge Cardiology
Tofacitinib postmarketing trial data shed light on JAK inhibitor risks
MDedge Cardiology
Long-term glucocorticoids in RA linked to increased cardiovascular risk
MDedge Cardiology
‘Goodie bag’ pill mill doctor sentenced to 2 decades in prison
MDedge Cardiology
Abortion debate may affect Rx decisions for pregnant women
MDedge Cardiology
Hydroxychloroquine risk found in some older patients with RA
MDedge Cardiology
Autoimmune diseases linked to spike in post-MI events
MDedge Cardiology
Randomized trial finds DMARD therapy for RA has a beneficial effect on vascular inflammation, CV risk
MDedge Cardiology