News

'Meaningful Use' for EHRs Defined


 

The Health and Human Services Department has released long-awaited, proposed “meaningful use” criteria for providers interested in receiving bonuses of up to $64,000 for installing or upgrading electronic health information systems.

“We've tried to build in flexibility in these standards and certification criteria as well as providing necessary guidance,” Dr. David Blumenthal, HHS' national coordinator for health information technology, said in a Dec. 30 conference call. “We hope we've provided a pathway toward more uniform standards over time, while at the same time making it possible in 2011 for well-intended providers and health professionals who want to become meaningful users to become so, and for the industry to create technology that will support that.”

Under the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH), a part of 2009's federal stimulus law, physicians who treat Medicare patients can get up to $44,000 over 5 years for the meaningful use of a certified health information system. Physicians whose patient populations are made up of at least 30% Medicaid patients can earn up to $64,000 in incentive payments for their use of the technology.

HHS issued two rules: one that outlines proposed provisions governing the incentive programs and an interim final regulation that sets initial standards, implementation specifications, and certification criteria for electronic health record (EHR) technology. Both are open for 60 days of public comment.

The criteria for achieving meaningful use start with certain minimum requirements in 2011 and build gradually, with more requirements added each year. For stage 1, which begins in 2011, meaningful-use requirements include:

▸ Use of computerized entry for 80% of all patient orders.

▸ Use of electronic prescribing for 75% of all permissible prescriptions.

▸ Maintenance of active medication and medication-allergy lists as part of the EHR for at least 80% of patients.

▸ Inclusion of demographic data (language, gender, ethnicity, insurance type, and date of birth) in the EHR of at least 80% of patients.

▸ Inclusion in the EHR of at least 50% of the lab results that can be recorded as either positive or negative or can be recorded with numerical data.

There are also requirements dealing with reporting quality data, filing claims electronically, encouraging patients to be more active in their care, improving care coordination, and ensuring privacy of health records.

In 2012, the rules tighten for submitting quality data. While providers are allowed to report quality data to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services through attestation in stage 1, data must be reported directly through certified EHR technology in stage 2.

“CMS recognizes that for clinical quality reporting to become routine, the administrative burden of reporting must be reduced,” said an agency statement. “By using certified EHR technology to report information on clinical quality measures electronically to a health information network, a state, CMS, or a registry, the burden on providers that are gathering the data and transmitting them will be greatly reduced.”

Dr. Blumenthal stressed that the standards are subject to comment, “and we'll carefully consider any comments about them and change the rule if we think it's required, based on those comments”

The American College of Cardiology noted on its Web site that only non–hospital-based physicians, that is, those who furnish less than 10% of their services in a hospital setting, are eligible for the incentives (www.acc.org

The American Medical Association responded cautiously to the proposed regulations. “We want physicians in all practice sizes and specialties to be able to take advantage of the stimulus incentives,” Dr. Steven Stack, a member of the association's board of directors, said in a statement. “We have provided ongoing input this year on standards for the use of EHRs and have stressed the importance of realistic timeframes for adoption, the removal of extraneous requirements that would delay successful adoption, and reasonable reporting requirements.”

The Medical Group Management Association (MGMA), however, was more direct. The proposed criteria “are overly complex and … medical groups will confront significant challenges trying to meet the program requirements,” the group said in a statement. It cites “unreasonable thresholds” for some criteria, including computerized physician order entry and electronic claims submission, and a requirement that physician offices provide patients and others with electronic copies of medical records among its objections.

“We were pleased to see that the CMS and ONC rules include some flexibility,” said MGMA president and CEO Dr. William Jessee. “However, we firmly believe that the government should make additional changes to achieve wide-spread adoption by professionals in all types of clinical settings.”

Pages

Recommended Reading

Feds Issue Rules for Use of Genetic Information by Insurers
MDedge Cardiology
Data Watch: Medicare, Medicaid Stays Account for 60% of Hospital Costs
MDedge Cardiology
On the Beat
MDedge Cardiology
One-Fifth of Presenters Mum On Disclosures
MDedge Cardiology
Policy & Practice : Can't get enough Policy & Practice? Check out our new podcast each Monday. egmnblog.wordpress.com
MDedge Cardiology
Data Watch: PhRMA Topped Health Sector Lobbying in Third Quarter
MDedge Cardiology
On the Beat
MDedge Cardiology
Policy & Practice : Want more health reform news? Subscribe to our podcast – search “Policy & Practice” in the iTunes store
MDedge Cardiology
On the Beat
MDedge Cardiology
FDA Seeks Advice for Guiding Health Content on the Web
MDedge Cardiology