Conference Coverage

Wearable defibrillator vest useful as bridge to ICD


 

AT HEART RHYTHM 2013

Dr. Michael R. Gold commented that in his experience, another important group of candidates for the wearable defibrillator are arrhythmia-prone patients who develop a cardiac device infection requiring device removal.

"You’re worried about that patient yet you can’t implant another device because it may take weeks or months to clear the infection," noted Dr. Gold, professor of medicine, chief of cardiology, and medical director of the heart and vascular center at the Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.

Dr. Goldenberg reported having received research grants from Zoll Medical, which sponsors the WEARIT-II registry and markets the LifeVest, as well as from Boston Scientific.

bjancin@frontlinemedcom.com

Pages

Recommended Reading

Single-chamber ICDs better when pacing isn't required
MDedge Cardiology
Antitachycardia pacing in ICDs linked to higher mortality
MDedge Cardiology
Biventricular pacing bests conventional tx in BLOCK HF trial
MDedge Cardiology
BRUISE CONTROL: Continue warfarin during cardiac device surgery
MDedge Cardiology
Upcoming guidelines on inherited arrhythmias contain surprises
MDedge Cardiology
DECAAF points way to improved AF ablation
MDedge Cardiology
Renal dysfunction improved after AF ablation
MDedge Cardiology
Watchman device hits home run in PROTECT AF trial
MDedge Cardiology
Leadless cardiac pacemaker draws plaudits
MDedge Cardiology
Cardiac implantable device infection rate is falling
MDedge Cardiology