News

S.D. voters to decide ‘any willing provider’ question; other state initiatives highlighted


 

References

Similarly, insurance companies would not be required to cover access to the investigational product.

The measure also provides protections for the physician, stating that a state regulatory authority cannot take action against a physician’s license “based solely on a physician’s recommendation to an eligible patient regarding or prescribing for or treatment with an investigational drug, biological product, or device.”

The language of the ballot measure passed the state House on March 4 and state Senate on April 15.

gtwachtman@frontlinemedcom.com

Pages

Recommended Reading

AMA calls on vendors, feds to improve usability of EHRs
MDedge Cardiology
Survey: Many physicians plan to reduce their workload
MDedge Cardiology
Congress poised to act on 2015 meaningful use full year reporting requirement
MDedge Cardiology
Telemetry guidelines built into order system saved $4.8 million annually
MDedge Cardiology
CMS website snafu could lead to penalties for meaningful users
MDedge Cardiology
Docs step up lobbying to extend Medicaid pay bump
MDedge Cardiology
Watchdog finds security lacking at healthcare.gov, two state marketplaces
MDedge Cardiology
Members of Congress urge physician pay for end-of-life counseling
MDedge Cardiology
CMS releases data on $3.5B in industry payments to doctors, teaching hospitals
MDedge Cardiology
The five “I’s” of electronic health records
MDedge Cardiology