Earn 0.25 hours AMA PRA Category 1 credit: Read this article, and click the link at the end to take the post-test.
SAN ANTONIO – Dietary restrictions prescribed for children with food allergies may lead to growth impairment, according to findings from a review of medical records for 245 food-allergic pediatric patients.
The risk of growth impairment was greatest for children whose dietary restrictions required elimination of more than two foods and/or elimination of cow’s milk, Dr. Brian P. Vickery reported at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology.
After age 2 years, the food-allergic children had lower mean percentiles for weight (67.5 vs. 72.5) and a lower body mass index (57.6 vs.68.0), than did 4,584 healthy age-matched controls.
Furthermore, the 52 patients with more than two food allergies (and thus more than two food restrictions), compared with 193 patients with one or two food allergies, had significantly lower mean percentiles for height (62.2 vs. 74.8) and weight (55.3 vs. 69.2). The 66 patients with milk allergy, compared with those with other food allergies, had lower mean percentiles for weight (54.5 vs. 70.6) and BMI (48.9 vs. 58.8), according to Dr. Vickery of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Milk-allergic children younger than 2 years of age were particularly vulnerable to growth restriction, he said during a press briefing at the meeting.
The food-allergic children in this study, who were aged 1 month to 11 years and who presented to a University of North Carolina outpatient clinic between 2007 and 2011, also were compared with 205 "disease controls," consisting of children with either cystic fibrosis or celiac disease, two conditions that are associated with impaired growth. When children passed their second birthday, the effect of food allergy on growth was very similar to the effect of celiac disease on growth, Dr. Vickery said.
The findings of this study confirm those from a smaller study, conducted more than a decade ago, that also showed that milk allergy and multiple food allergies were associated with growth impairment.
That study is "the most commonly cited previous study to address the growth of food-allergic children in the United States," Dr. Vickery noted.
"The prevalence [of food allergy] has increased over the past 10 years, so we wanted to take another look in a bigger population to kind of reassess the impact of elimination diets on growth," he said.
The current findings demonstrate that a food allergy–associated elimination diet can place children at risk of impaired growth, compared with their healthy peers, regardless of whether they are under age 2 years, or are 2-11 years old, and that after age 2, the effect of food allergy on growth is very similar to that of chronic diseases known to affect growth, he said.
"While awareness of food allergy is increasing along with the prevalence of the disease, it is important to draw attention to the important consequences of elimination diets. We feel that providers should counsel patients and caregivers about the growth-related risks of the elimination diets that are used to treat food allergy, and ensure that families are excluding only the foods that are medically required or otherwise culturally indicated, that nutritional assessment and/or supplementation is provided as needed, and that subspecialty consultation is arranged, especially for children at highest risk," he said.
Dr. Vickery reported having no relevant financial disclosures.
To earn 0.25 hours AMA PRA Category 1 credit after reading this article, take the post-test here.