The total RegiSCAR score of 8 in our case was taken as a definite indication of DRESS syndrome (temperature, 38.5°C [0 points]; enlarged lymph nodes [1 point]; eosinophilia, ≥20% or >1500 μL [2 points]; skin involvement with >50% body surface area involved [1 point] with a maculopapular rash [1 point] and histopathologic findings suggesting DRESS syndrome [1 point]; lung and liver involvement [2 points]). The causative drug was identified by carefully collecting the patient’s medication history and by evaluating clinical outcome characterized by improved skin and systemic symptoms after discontinuation of strontium ranelate.
Because of the high morbidity of DRESS syndrome, it needs to be diagnosed effectively and must be considered in the differential for any patient developing the triad of skin rash, hypereosinophilia, and systemic symptoms, as well as several other side effects when taking strontium ranelate.10
Treatment of DRESS syndrome has not yet been standardized. Prompt withdrawal of the causative drug is the only mandatory activity in the treatment of DRESS syndrome. Systemic corticosteroids may be needed for organ or life-threatening disease, though the efficacy is controversial because it may result in activation of HHV-6, which in turn is probably involved in the pathogenesis of DRESS syndrome.
This case confirms that strontium ranelate should be considered a possible factor in the etiopathology of DRESS syndrome and in the development of autoimmune hepatitis as a part of DRESS syndrome. Case reports underline the importance of recognition of cutaneous adverse reactions in patients undergoing treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. The prognosis is good with immediate recognition followed by immediate and permanent withdrawal of the drug, along with hospitalization and systemic corticosteroids when necessary. The possibility of developing autoimmune hepatitis as a part of DRESS syndrome related to strontium ranelate has been reported,11 usually months after the acute episode.