Original Research

Impact of Acne Vulgaris on Quality of Life and Self-esteem

Author and Disclosure Information

The psychological impact of acne is determined by various factors including age, sex, personality, grade of disease, scarring, and environmental and ethnic background. Apart from managing the clinical manifestations of acne, clinicians also have to deal with the psychological aspects of the disease by assessing patients’ quality of life (QOL) and self-esteem. These measures will aid in better management of acne patients. This study examined the relationship between acne and QOL and self-esteem. The results showed that acne severity may have a considerable adverse impact on QOL and self-esteem. Dermatologists need to emphasize the psychosocial sequelae of acne through awareness programs and encourage medical treatment along with basic psychosomatic remedies in the management of acne.

Practice Points

  • Grading of acne will help with appropriate treatment, thus reducing the adverse psychological effects of the condition.
  • Acne severity has a negative impact on quality of life and self-esteem.
  • A sympathetic approach and basic psychosomatic treatment are necessary in the management of acne.


 

References

Acne vulgaris predominantly occurs during puberty and can persist beyond 25 years of age, most commonly in women.1,2 Although acne does not cause physical impairment, it can be associated with a considerable psychosocial burden including increased levels of anxiety, anger, depression, and frustration, which in turn can affect vocational and academic performance, quality of life (QOL), and self-esteem.3

Quality of life measures provide valuable insight into the debilitating effects of acne.1 It has been suggested that acne patients may experience poor body image and low self-esteem as well as social isolation and constriction of activities.4 Self-esteem is a favorable and unfavorable attitude toward oneself.5 A marked emphasis has been placed on body image in society, fueled by external cues such as the media.3,6 This study was carried out to assess QOL and self-esteem in acne patients.

Methods

This prospective, hospital-based, cross-sectional, case-control study was conducted at The Oxford Medical College, Hospital & Research Center (Bangalore, India), over a period of 3 months. One hundred consecutive acne cases (age range, 12–45 years) and 100 age- and gender-matched controls who did not have any skin disease provided consent and were included in the analysis. Guardians gave consent for individuals who were younger than 18 years. Exclusion criteria for cases included a medical disorder (eg, epilepsy, diabetes mellitus, hypertension) or medications that would likely interfere with acne assessment.

The cases and controls were administered a semistructured questionnaire to collect sociodemographic details. Acne was graded for the predominant lesions, QOL was assessed using the Cardiff Acne Disability Index (CADI) and World Health Organization Quality of Life–BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) scale, and self-esteem was measured using the Rosenberg self-esteem scale (RSES). The study was approved by the institutional review board.

Acne Grading

Acne was graded according to the predominant lesions using the following criteria: grade 1=comedones and occasional papules; grade 2=papules, comedones, and few pustules; grade 3=predominant pustules, nodules, and abscesses; and grade 4=mainly cysts, abscesses, and widespread scarring.1

Quality of Life Assessment

The CADI questionnaire was used to assess the level of disability caused by acne.6 It is a 5-item questionnaire with scores ranging from 0 to 3 for a total maximum score of 15 and minimum score of 0. Total scores were classified as low (0–4), medium (5–9), and high (10–15).7

The WHOQOL-BREF is a self-reported questionnaire containing 26 items that make up the 4 domains of physical health (7 items), psychological health (6 items), social relationships (3 items), and environment (8 items); there also are 2 single questions regarding the overall perception of QOL and health. Questions were scored on aseries of 5-point scales with higher scores denoting better QOL.8

Self-esteem Assessment

The RSES uses a 5-point Likert scale from strongly agree to strongly disagree to rate a series of 10 statements. The total score ranges from 0 to 30. Scores less than 15 suggest low self-esteem, while scores of 15 and greater indicate high self-esteem.5

Statistical Analysis

Results were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistical methods. A χ2 test was used for categorical data, and a Student t test and an analysis of variance were used for continuous data.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Smooth hair – an acne-causing epidemic
MDedge Dermatology
Get to Know NO: Deconstructing the Data on Nitric Oxide–Releasing Technologies for Acne
MDedge Dermatology
Experts present first recommendations for treating acne fulminans
MDedge Dermatology
Lasers for Darker Skin Types
MDedge Dermatology
High-Value, Cost-Conscious Evaluation for PCOS: Which Tests Should Be Routinely Ordered in Acne Patients?
MDedge Dermatology
Enlarged Facial Pores: An Update on Treatments
MDedge Dermatology
Diet and Acne: Where Are We?
MDedge Dermatology
Comparison of Pneumatic Broadband Light Plus Adapalene Gel 0.3% Versus Adapalene Gel 0.3% Monotherapy in the Treatment of Mild to Moderate Acne
MDedge Dermatology
Cosmetic Corner: Dermatologists Weigh in on OTC Acne Treatments
MDedge Dermatology
FDA approves first retinoid for OTC acne treatment
MDedge Dermatology