Case Letter

Enhanced Radiation Dermatitis Associated With Concurrent Palliative Radiation and Vemurafenib Therapy

Author and Disclosure Information

Practice Points

  • Given the increased frequency of palliative and adjuvant radiation therapy in patients with metastatic melanoma, it is critical to understand the potential cutaneous side effects of vemurafenib when used in conjunction with radiotherapy.
  • Clinicians should be aware of the increased risk for severe radiation dermatitis in patients on vemurafenib who are receiving concurrent palliative radiation therapy.


 

References

To the Editor:

Vemurafenib is a selective BRAF inhibitor that was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in August 2011 for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma with the BRAF V600E mutation as detected by an approved test. Both malignant and nonmalignant cutaneous findings have been well documented in association with vemurafenib, including squamous cell carcinoma, keratoacanthomas, UVA photosensitivity, keratosis pilaris–like eruptions, seborrheic dermatitis, follicular plugging, follicular hyperkeratosis, and eruptive melanocytic nevi.1 As more patients with metastatic melanoma are treated with vemurafenib, the use of concomitant palliative or adjuvant radiation therapy with vemurafenib will inevitably occur in greater frequency. Therefore, it is critical to understand the potential cutaneous side effects of this combination.

A predisposition to enhanced radiation dermatitis has been well described with concurrent use of targeted chemotherapies such as the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor cetuximab with radiotherapy.2 We report a case of radiation dermatitis occurring shortly after initiating radiation therapy in a patient on vemurafenib.

A 53-year-old man with initial stage IIIB melanoma, Breslow depth 2.2 mm with histologic ulceration, and a mitotic index of 2/mm2 on the right buttock underwent wide local excision and sentinel lymph node biopsy followed by complete lymph node dissection with a total of 2 of 10 positive lymph nodes. The patient subsequently underwent 1 year of adjuvant high-dose interferon therapy. Four years after his initial presentation he developed metastases to the lungs, pelvis, and both femurs. He was started on oral vemurafenib 960 mg twice daily. Due to painful bony metastases in the pelvis, the patient also was started on concurrent palliative radiation therapy to both femurs, L5 vertebra, and the sacrum 1 day after initiation of vemurafenib. Three days after initiation of radiation therapy at a cumulative radiation dose of 0.75 Gy, the patient developed severe, painful, well-demarcated, erythematous plaques in the anterior and posterior pelvic distribution overlying the radiation field (Figure 1) that subsequently evolved to eroded desquamative plaques with copious transudate. The patient also developed hyperkeratotic papules on the chest and thighs consistent with the keratosis pilaris–like eruptions associated with vemurafenib therapy.1 Five months later the patient developed worsening neurologic symptoms, and magnetic resonance imaging of the brain revealed multiple brain metastases. Given his disease progression, vemurafenib was discontinued. Ten days later, the patient underwent palliative whole-brain radiation therapy. He received a total dose of 3.25 Gy to the whole brain without any cutaneous sequelae.

Figure 1. Radiation dermatitis of the buttocks (A), right side of the groin (B), and left side of the groin (C) while on vemurafenib.

The pathophysiology of radiation dermatitis is caused by a dose-dependent loss of basal and endothelial cells following irradiation.3 If surviving basal cells are able to repopulate the basal monolayer, normal skin barrier function is preserved. Dose tolerance is exceeded when cell loss without replacement occurs, resulting in necrosis and clinical evidence of radiation dermatitis, which is characterized by painful erythema or hyperpigmentation followed by desquamation and skin necrosis. In general, occurrence and severity of radiation dermatitis when radiation therapy is used alone in the absence of concurrent chemotherapy is dose dependent, with cutaneous evidence of radiation dermatitis occurring at doses ranging from as low as 2 Gy but most commonly 5 to 10 Gy.4 A report of radiation recall dermatitis in 2 patients who received vemurafenib after completing a full course of radiotherapy5 supports the hypothesis that vemurafenib is a radiosensitizing medication. Enhanced radiation dermatitis was reported in a single case of a patient on vemurafenib who developed radiation dermatitis after completing 3.25 Gy of radiation to the lumbar spine. Although this case likely depicted enhanced radiation dermatitis secondary to concurrent vemurafenib use, it was inconclusive whether vemurafenib contributed to the cutaneous effect, as the patient developed a cutaneous skin reaction 1 week after receiving a cumulative radiation dose of 3.25 Gy, a level at which radiation alone has been shown to cause skin toxicity.6 In our patient, cutaneous manifestations were noted 3 days after initiation of radiation treatment, at which point he had received a total radiation dose of 0.75 Gy, which is well below the threshold commonly recognized to cause radiation-induced skin toxicities. In addition, rechallenge in this patient with higher-dose radiotherapy while off of vemurafenib treatment led to no skin toxicity, despite the common side effects of whole-brain radiation therapy including radiation dermatitis and alopecia.7

Pages

Recommended Reading

Dual immune checkpoint blockade found durable in melanoma
MDedge Dermatology
Study tracks distant metastatic patterns of Merkel cell carcinoma
MDedge Dermatology
Study tracks distant metastatic patterns of Merkel cell carcinoma
MDedge Dermatology
40% of top-rated sunscreens fall short of AAD guidelines
MDedge Dermatology
Sunscreens May Fail to Meet SPF Claims on Product Labels
MDedge Dermatology
Pembrolizumab-ipilimumab combo is highly active in advanced melanoma
MDedge Dermatology
Here’s how to tackle teenage tanning
MDedge Dermatology
USPSTF: Visual skin cancer screening lacks supporting evidence
MDedge Dermatology
Skin Examinations for Early Melanoma Detection
MDedge Dermatology
Certain skin cancers respond to nonsurgical treatments
MDedge Dermatology