Conference Coverage

Abatacept makes inroads in psoriatic arthritis


 

AT THE ACR ANNUAL MEETING

WASHINGTON – Abatacept achieved promising results in patients with psoriatic arthritis through 24 weeks of treatment in a placebo-controlled, phase III trial.

Dr. Philip J. Mease

Dr. Philip J. Mease

“I am thrilled to present these results in PsA,” said lead investigator Philip J. Mease, MD, of Swedish Medical Center, Seattle. “Many patients with PsA have an inadequate response to available medications. There is an unmet need for new targeted therapies for PsA. Abatacept, a selective T-cell co-stimulation modulator, is a potential new therapy for PsA with a distinct mechanism of action upstream of currently available agents.”

ASTRAEA (Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Abatacept in Adults With Active Psoriatic Arthritis) enrolled 424 patients who met ACR PsA criteria and had evidence of active arthritis and psoriasis, plus inadequate response or intolerance to at least one nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD). The patients, of whom 60% failed prior tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) treatment, were randomized to abatacept subcutaneous injection 125 mg/week or placebo. Median age was around 50 years, and about 50% were males. A total of 60% were on concomitant methotrexate.

“This was an active disease population, with about two-thirds having elevated C-reactive protein,” Dr. Mease noted at the annual meeting of the American College of Rheumatology.

A total of 39.4% of abatacept-treated patients achieved the primary endpoint of 24-week ACR20 response versus 22.3% of placebo patients (P less than .001). Improvement on ACR20 continued out to week 44.

Patients who were TNFi naive had better ACR20 responses than did those previously exposed to TNFi, he said. An ACR20 response occurred in 44% of TNFi-naive patients on abatacept, compared with 36.4% of TNFi-exposed patients. The same pattern was observed for ACR50 and ACR70 response rates.

A linear relationship was seen between response to abatacept and CRP baseline level, with a greater degree of response in those with elevated CRP.

Numerical trends favored abatacept for 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) responses, and X-ray assessment of structural damage. “We saw complete resolution of enthesitis and dactylitis at week 24 in 30%-40% of patients taking abatacept, and responses improved over time,” Dr. Mease told listeners. “Skin responses on the PASI 50 and PASI 75 were modest and not as good as we see with other agents,” Dr. Mease said.

Few serious adverse events were reported. There were three serious infections in the abatacept group and two in the placebo group at week 24.

“These data are consistent with phase II data. Overall, we saw beneficial trends with abatacept for all key endpoints, and the benefits were observed in both TNFi-exposed and TNFi-naive patients subgroups. Abatacept may be an appropriate option for PsA patients to try, especially those with musculoskeletal manifestations [given the modest responses in skin],” Dr. Mease said.

All of the ASTRAEA investigators had industry relationships, including some with Bristol-Myers Squibb. Two were employees of the company.

Recommended Reading

Surgical Risks From Systemic Psoriasis Therapies
MDedge Dermatology
Secukinumab for psoriasis at 4 years: undiminished efficacy and safety
MDedge Dermatology
Tildrakizumab for psoriasis scores high marks in phase III
MDedge Dermatology
PsA bone loss measurement: A surrogate for radiographic progression?
MDedge Dermatology
Close monitoring of psoriasis patients can delay PsA onset
MDedge Dermatology
What good are biosimilars if patients won’t use them?
MDedge Dermatology
Optimize anti–TNF-alpha therapy for psoriasis
MDedge Dermatology
Study offers reassuring data on certolizumab use in pregnancy
MDedge Dermatology
VIDEO: IL-23 inhibitors on the upswing
MDedge Dermatology
VIDEO: Consider comorbidities when preparing patients for systemic psoriasis therapy
MDedge Dermatology