Comment
We report the development of multiple KAs arising both from within surgical margins and de novo, and resolution with intralesional MTX. Keratoacanthomas, especially various KA types, have been observed to develop due to various types of trauma, including sites of surgical scars, lichen planus, tattoos, thermal burns, radiation, and discoid lupus erythematosus, and within skin grafts and donor sites.5-19
Hypertrophic lichen planus is a chronic variant of lichen planus that often is found on the pretibial areas of the lower legs.13 Both SCC and reactive KAs have been observed to develop within lesions of HLP.14 Our pathologist commented on the presence of a lichenoid infiltrate with necrotic keratinocytes and epidermal hyperplasia suspicious for HLP, with a small focus of cystic and endophytic squamous proliferation. The latter lacked notable atypia or an invasive component and could represent an irritated infundibular cyst versus an early evolving KA.
The lichenoid inflammation is suspicious for HLP, which has been associated with eruptive KAs13-16 and may have contributed to the development of persistent KAs in our patient, both in sites of surgical scars (the anterior aspect of the leg) and in uninvolved skin (the posterior aspect of the leg). Trauma from the prior surgery may have stimulated a local inflammatory response and, if coupled with a preexisting underlying chronic inflammatory condition such as HLP, may have triggered the development of new lesions on the posterior leg. Skin pathergy reactions also are caused by an upregulated inflammatory response, which is reduced with immunosuppressive agents such as MTX.12
In our patient, there was both an isotopic and isomorphic response. The term isotopic response refers to the occurrence of a new skin disorder at the site of another unrelated and already healed skin disease. It was first defined by Wolf and Wolf20 in 1985 and hence is also known as Wolf isotopic response. The isotopic response in our patient occurred in the setting of lichen planus. The isomorphic response indicates the appearance of typical skin lesions of an existing dermatosis at sites of other skin injuries.
Initially, we thought the patient had recurrence of SCC, but with the rapid development of multiple lesions, the diagnosis of multiple KAs was more likely. Kimyai-Asadi et al8 demonstrated that surgical trauma can precede the development of KAs, as they reported a patient who developed a KA at an excision site. Tamir et al7 reported the simultaneous appearance of KAs in burn scars and skin graft donor sites 4 months after a 40% total body surface area burn. Hamilton et al11 described surgical trauma from a split-skin graft donor site as a trigger for the onset of a KA.
Multiple treatment alternatives exist for KAs, with the standard of care for large or high-risk KAs being excisional surgery21,22; however, other approaches may need to be considered in certain cases, such as with multiple KAs in which lesions may be large and extensive, thereby yielding poor cosmetic outcomes, or with increased surgical risk.23 Furthermore, multiple KAs that develop in the setting of surgical scars require special consideration. Topical 5-fluorouracil, various systemic and intralesional agents (eg, retinoids, interferon, bleomycin, MTX), laser therapy, electrodesiccation and curettage, radiotherapy, and photodynamic therapy all have been reported as methods employed for the treatment of KA.23-27 Goldberg et al5 reported cases of resolution of eruptive KAs arising in both surgical and nonsurgical sites with a combination of deep shave excision, MMS, curettage and desiccation, and oral isotretinoin.
For our patient, we opted for treatment with intralesional MTX, both due to its effectiveness for solitary KAs and reasonably decreased risk of morbidity compared to surgical excision of regions of the pretibial calves. Treatment with MTX would not have been attempted if there was any clinical doubt that the lesions were not the well-differentiated KA type. Also, we had a low threshold for discontinuing therapy and reverting to MMS treatment if any of the lesions displayed a paradoxical growth post-MTX treatment or failed to respond after 3 treatments. Intralesional MTX is less invasive, relatively inexpensive, and a treatment modality with decreased morbidity for KAs, especially for multiple KAs. It should be considered as a potential alternative to surgery in such cases.23-27