Law & Medicine

Duty vs. confidentiality


 

Dr. Tan is emeritus professor of medicine and former adjunct professor of law at the University of Hawaii, Honolulu. This article is meant to be educational and does not constitute medical, ethical, or legal advice. Some of the materials have been taken from earlier columns in Internal Medicine News. For additional information, readers may contact the author at siang@hawaii.edu.

References

1. Volk v. DeMeerleer, 386 P.3d 254 (Wa. 2016).

2. Tarasoff v. Regents of University of California, 551 P.2d 334 (Cal. 1976).

3. Thompson v. County of Alameda, 167 Cal. Rptr. 70, 76 (1980).

4. Behav Sci Law. 2001;19(3):325-43.

5. AMA Code of Medical Ethics [2.24 (3), 2012-2013 ed].

6. AMA Code of Medical Ethics, 2017 ed. [3.2.1 Confidentiality].

Pages

Recommended Reading

Burnout for Dermatologists: Report From the Mount Sinai Fall Symposium
MDedge Dermatology
Update on Coding Changes: Report From the Mount Sinai Fall Symposium
MDedge Dermatology
Proposed MACRA participation threshold gets mixed reviews
MDedge Dermatology
HHS Secretary resigns amid flight criticism
MDedge Dermatology
Ruling: Apologies can’t be used against doctors in court
MDedge Dermatology
Major Changes in the American Board of Dermatology’s Certification Examination
MDedge Dermatology
HCA is the country’s highest-volume health system
MDedge Dermatology
Now missing in EHR charts: a good impression
MDedge Dermatology
MIPS: It’s time to get started
MDedge Dermatology
Death by meeting
MDedge Dermatology