News from the FDA/CDC

Zika-linked birth defects climbing in U.S. hot spots

View on the News

Watch for Zika effects throughout childhood

Although these birth defects are not specific to congenital Zika virus infection, only those defects found previously to be most closely aligned with congenital Zika infection had increased prevalence.

Dr. Brenda Fitzgerald, director of the CDC

Dr. Brenda Fitzgerald

The full range of developmental disabilities and other adverse early childhood outcomes associated with congenital Zika virus infection in the United States can only be determined by following up the infants and children as they develop. Understanding what is happening with those infants might have far-reaching implications for other exposed infants whose congenital infection was not identified during pregnancy or at birth.

It is critical that public health surveillance programs continue reporting the occurrence of these birth defects to monitor for trends following the Zika virus outbreak.

Brenda Fitzgerald , MD, is the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta. Coleen A. Boyle , PhD, is the director of the CDC National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, and Margaret Honein , PhD, is chief of the agency’s Birth Defects Branch. They made their comments Jan. 25 in JAMA, and had no conflicts of interest (Jama. 2018 Jan 25. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.0126).


 

FROM MMWR

The prevalence of birth defects strongly linked with congenital Zika virus infection increased 21% from the first to the second half of 2016 in areas of the United States with local, endemic transmission: Puerto Rico, south Florida, and southern Texas, according to a report in the Jan. 26 edition of Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.

In those areas, complications strongly associated with Zika – including microcephaly; brain and eye abnormalities; and neurogenic hip dislocation, clubfoot, hearing loss, and arthrogryposis – jumped from 2.0 to 2.4 cases per 1,000 live births, with 140 cases in the first half of the year and 169 cases in the second (P = .009). Microcephaly and brain abnormalities were the most common problems.

Baby with microcephaly undergoes a physical therapy session. Sumaia Villela/Agência Brasil/CC BY 3.0 BR

Baby with microcephaly undergoes a physical therapy session.

Meanwhile, in areas with one or more cases of confirmed travel-associated Zika per 100,000 residents, such as New York and Georgia, the prevalence of those problems held steady throughout 2016 at 2.4 cases per 1,000 live births.

In places with less than one confirmed Zika case from travel per 100,000 residents, such as Hawaii and Utah, the prevalence of birth defects strongly linked to Zika actually dropped from 2.8 cases per 1,000 live births to 2.4 in 2016.

The 15 U.S. jurisdictions in the study included nearly 1 million live births, representing approximately one fourth of the total live births in the United States in 2016. The live birth rate was 92% among the 2,962 infants and fetuses with Zika-associated birth defects.

All the jurisdictions had existing birth defects surveillance systems that quickly adapted to monitor for potential Zika defects. However, although strongly associated with Zika, there’s no guarantee that the birth defects in the study were actually caused by the virus, the researchers noted.

“These data will help communities plan for needed resources to care for affected patients and families and can serve as a foundation for linking and evaluating health and developmental outcomes of affected children,” said the investigators, led by Augustina Delaney, PhD, of the National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta.

The work was the first population-based birth defect surveillance report for Zika. The CDC follows confirmed Zika cases in pregnant women and their offspring closely, but only a small portion of women are actually tested, so there’s likely far more cases of congenital Zika infection than show up in registries. Despite its limits, birth defect surveillance likely provides a more accurate picture of the actual extent of the problem.

It’s not known why Zika-linked birth defects dropped off in areas with low or no travel-associated cases. “However ... further case ascertainment from the final quarter of 2016 is anticipated in all jurisdictions,” so the numbers could change, the authors said.

They had no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Delaney A, et. al. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018 Jan 26;67(3):91-6

Recommended Reading

CDC: First-trimester Zika infection had highest rate of birth defects
MDedge Dermatology
Asymptomatic maternal Zika infection doesn’t dampen birth defect risk
MDedge Dermatology
Preventing Zika in pregnancy: What you need to know
MDedge Dermatology
Antiviral shows early promise for treatment of Zika infection
MDedge Dermatology
CDC refocuses Zika testing recommendations in pregnancy
MDedge Dermatology
Zika linked to a spectrum of neuroinflammatory diseases
MDedge Dermatology
Zika’s 2017 summer less active than 2016
MDedge Dermatology
Zika: CDC begins transition from emergency to long-term response
MDedge Dermatology
Rio Olympics tally for U.S. athletes is 6% West Nile infections, no Zika
MDedge Dermatology
The race is on for a Zika vaccine
MDedge Dermatology