Clinical Review

Emerging Therapies In Psoriasis: A Systematic Review

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

TNF Inhibitor

Certolizumab Pegol
Certolizumab pegol is a human PEGylated anti-TNF agent. In vitro studies have shown that certolizumab binds to soluble and membrane-bound TNF.19 Unlike other TNF inhibitors, certolizumab pegol is a Fab‘ portion of anti-TNF conjugated to a molecule of polyethylene glycol.19 The drug is approved in the United States for treating psoriatic arthritis, Crohn disease, and rheumatoid arthritis; its potential for treating psoriasis has been confirmed. Results of 1 phase 2 trial have been published19; data from 3 phase 3 trials are forthcoming.

This randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 2 study comprised 176 patients who received certolizumab 200 mg, certolizumab 400 mg, or placebo. The dosing schedule was 400 mg at week 0, followed by either 200 or 400 mg every other week until week 10. Co-primary end points were PASI 75 and a PGA score of 0 or 1 at week 12.19

Certolizumab was significantly more effective than placebo at week 12: 74.6% of the 200-mg group and 82.8% of the 400-mg group achieved PASI 75 compared to 6.8% of the placebo group (P<.001). Certolizumab also performed better for the PGA score: 52.5% and 72.4% of patients attained a score of 0 or 1 in the 200-mg and 400-mg groups compared to 1.7% in the placebo group.19

Adverse events were reported equally across all groups: 72% of patients in the 200-mg group, 70% in the 400-mg group, and 71% in the placebo group reported at least 1 AE, most commonly nasopharyngitis, headache, and pruritis.19

COMMENT

With the development of new insights into the pathogenesis of psoriasis, therapies that are targeted toward key cytokines may contribute to improved management of the disease. The results of these clinical trials demonstrate numerous promising options for psoriatic patients.

IL-17 Inhibitors Ixekizumab and Brodalumab

When comparing these 2 biologics, it is important to consider that these studies were not performed head to head, thereby inhibiting direct comparisons. Moreover, dosage ranges of the investigative drugs were not identical, which also makes comparisons challenging. However, when looking at the highest dosages of ixekizumab and brodalumab, results indicate that ixekizumab may be slightly more effective than brodalumab based on the percentage of patients who achieved a PASI 75 and a static PGA score of 0 or 1 (eTable 1).

Phase 3 trials have shown ixekizumab to maintain efficacy over 60 weeks of treatment.6 Ixekizumab also has been shown to alleviate other symptoms of psoriasis, such as itching, pain, and nail involvement.20,21 Furthermore, ixekizumab appears to be equally effective in patients with or without prior exposure to biologics22; therefore, ixekizumab may benefit patients who have not experienced success with other biologics.

Across the UNCOVER trials, 11 cases of inflammatory bowel disease were reported in patients receiving ixekizumab (ulcerative colitis in 7; Crohn disease in 4)6; it appears that at least 3 of these cases were new diagnoses. In light of a study suggesting that IL-17A might have a protective function in the intestine,23 these findings may have important clinical implications and require follow-up studies.

Brodalumab also has been shown to maintain efficacy and acceptable safety for as long as 120 weeks.24 In the extension period of the AMAGINE-1 trial, patients who experienced a return of disease during a withdrawal period recaptured static PGA success with re-treatment for 12 weeks (re-treatment was successful in 97% of those given a dosage of 210 mg and in 84% of those given 140 mg).8

Furthermore, phase 2 trials also have shown that brodalumab is effective in patients with a history of biologic use.25 Across all AMAGINE trials, only 1 case of Crohn disease was reported in a patient taking brodalumab.9 There are concerns about depression, despite data from AMAGINE-1 stating patients on brodalumab actually had greater improvements in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale scores after 12 weeks of treatment (P<.001) for both brodalumab 140 mg and 210 mg compared to placebo.8 Regardless, brodalumab has a black-box warning for suicidal ideation and behavior, and availability is restricted through a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) program.26

Bimekizumab

Although no phase 2 or phase 3 clinical trial data have been published for bimekizumab (phase 2 trials are underway), it has been shown in a phase 1 trial to be effective for psoriasis. Bimekizumab also is unique; it is the first dual inhibitor of IL-17A and IL-17F.18

Pages

Recommended Reading

Biologics have best chance of achieving PASI 90 in psoriasis
MDedge Dermatology
VIDEO: With new therapies available, it’s the ‘decade of eczema,’ researcher says
MDedge Dermatology
Ustekinumab quells aortic inflammation in patients with severe psoriasis
MDedge Dermatology
Could guselkumab be a disease-modifying agent in plaque psoriasis?
MDedge Dermatology
VIDEO: PPACMAN aims to advance the combined rheum-derm clinic approach in the community
MDedge Dermatology
Online psoriasis consultations shown equivalent to office visits
MDedge Dermatology
Phase 3 trials show halobetasol/tazarotene lotion works for psoriasis
MDedge Dermatology
Do Psoriasis Patients Engage In Vigorous Physical Activity?
MDedge Dermatology
Concurrent Anticytokine Biologics for the Management of Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Are They Safe and Effective?
MDedge Dermatology
Pushing the Limits: Developing a New Standard of Care for Psoriasis
MDedge Dermatology