From the Journals

Hyaluronic acid filler preferred for infraorbital hollowing


 

FROM JAMA FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY

Most patients who responded to surveys reported being satisfied after off-label treatment with Juvéderm Voluma XC hyaluronic acid filler for infraorbital hollowing, a study finds.

Adverse effects were reported in 12% of patients.

The treatment’s “high patient satisfaction profile and a similar safety profile among other soft-tissue fillers make it an excellent adjunct in the plastic surgeon’s armamentarium,” reported Michael B. Hall, MD, and his associates at their private, ambulatory facial plastic and reconstructive surgery practice in Austin, Texas, in JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery.

According to the researchers, the Food and Drug Administration has not approved any soft-tissue fillers for the periorbital complex. At their practice, Dr. Hall and his associates treat infraorbital hollows with Juvéderm Voluma XC, which is approved by the FDA for certain types of cheek augmentation. Other studies have examined Belotero or Restylane as treatments for building volume in the periorbital area, the authors wrote, but research into cosmetic injections of Juvéderm Voluma XC is lacking.

For the new study, the researchers retrospectively analyzed the cases of 101 patients (aged 32-75 years, with average age of 54 years; 89% female; 54% Fitzpatrick skin type II; racial breakdown not reported) who were electively treated with the filler for infraorbital hollowing in 2016 and 2017. The patients received an average 1 mL of the treatment gel.

The patients were photographed and answered surveys, and they were evaluated using the Allergan Infraorbital Hollows Scale. Follow-up time averaged 12 months.

A total of 18 patients (18%) required touch-up within 3 months, and 2 required multiple touch-ups. A total of 12 subjects (12%) had adverse effects (including 3 who had more than one), which included bruising (10%), contour irregularities (2%), edema (3%) and Tyndall effect (1%). Hyaluronidase was required in 3 patients (3%), and 24 patients sought further treatment after 3 months.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Review finds some evidence of efficacy for nonpharmacological acne therapies
MDedge Dermatology
Less vacuum may reduce post–cryolipolysis adipose hyperplasia
MDedge Dermatology
The role of defensins in treating skin aging
MDedge Dermatology
Laser tattoo removal clinic closures: Are patients getting scammed?
MDedge Dermatology
Microneedling improved acne scars in small study of patients with darker skin
MDedge Dermatology
Update on Noninvasive Body Contouring Techniques
MDedge Dermatology
Liability claims from cutaneous laser surgery continue to rise
MDedge Dermatology
Recently approved SK treatment spares melanocytes in preclinical study
MDedge Dermatology
Carboxytherapy caused small yet transient subcutaneous fat reduction
MDedge Dermatology
Few physicians report adverse events related to body contouring devices
MDedge Dermatology