In the dermatology consult, biopsy was employed for diagnosis in only 18%. As for treatment, 42% received topical therapy alone, and 38% received a systemic therapy. Dermatologic consultations that subsequently involved consultation with another service such as allergy and immunology, were rare, occurring in only 4% of cases.
Furthermore, they suggested that the data support increased attention to dermatologic complications in cancer. Although the impact of consultations on outcome was not evaluated in this study, the authors cited another recent study in which there was a more than 2-day reduction in hospital stay when a dermatology consultation was employed in noncancer patients with an inflammatory skin disease (JAMA Dermatol. 2017 Jun 1;153[6]:523-8). Moreover, they speculated that a prompt resolution of dermatologic complaints in cancer patients has implications for better outcomes if they result in fewer delays in anti-cancer therapy.
The study was partly funded by the a grant from the National Cancer Institute’s Cancer Centers Program. Dr. Lacouture reported financial relationships with AstraZeneca, Adgero Biopharmaceuticals, Berg, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Foamix, Janssen, Legacy Healthcare, NovoCure, and Quintiles. Another author reported ties with Amgen, Roche, Eaisi, and P Value Communications.
SOURCE: Phillips GS et al. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018 Jun;78(6):1102-9.