Conference Coverage

Real-world experience with dupilumab in AD mirrors clinical trial efficacy


 

REPORTING FROM WCD2019

– A retrospective, multicenter study affirmed clinical trial results showing the beneficial clinical impact of dupilumab in adults with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis, Maria Fargnoli, MD, reported at the World Congress of Dermatology.

Dr. Maria Concetta Fargnoli, a dermatologist at the University of l'Aquila, Italy Kari Oakes/MDedge News

Dr. Maria Fargnoli

By the end of 4 weeks of treatment, participants’ mean Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score had dropped from 33.3 to 15.3, a 54.2% reduction. At 16 weeks, the mean EASI score was 9.2, a reduction of 72.5% from baseline (P less than .001 for both time points, compared with baseline). At 16 weeks, 87.2% of patients achieved EASI 50, 60.6% achieved EASI 75, and 32.4% achieved EASI 90.

“In a real-life context, dupilumab significantly improved disease severity, pruritus, sleep loss, and quality of life in adult moderate to severe atopic dermatitis patients,” said Dr. Fargnoli, presenting results of the study during a late-breaking abstract session at the meeting. “All measures improved at 4 weeks, and a further decline was seen at 16 weeks. … These results confirm data from clinical trials, and from other real-life experiences with dupilumab.”

The study, conducted in Italy, tracked outcomes for 109 patients treated for moderate to severe atopic dermatitis at 39 centers from June 2018 to February 2019. Adult patients with EASI scores of at least 24 with contraindications, failure, or intolerance of corticosteroid therapy were included and followed for at least 16 weeks. Those who had concomitant systemic anti-inflammatory or immunomodulator use were excluded, as were those with missing data, said Dr. Fargnoli, chair of the department of dermatology at the University of L’Aquila (Italy).

Patients were given a loading dose of two 300-mg subcutaneous injections of dupilumab, followed by 300-mg injections at 2-week intervals.

Patients were assessed at baseline and after 4 and 16 weeks of treatment. In addition to EASI score, itch and sleep were measured via numeric rating scales; mean itch scores dropped from 8.4 at baseline to 4.1 after 4 weeks, and to 2.5 at 16 weeks (P less than .001 for both time points, compared with baseline).

Sleep scores also improved, from a mean 6.9 at baseline to 3.3 at four weeks, and 1.9 at 16 weeks (P less than .001 for both time points, compared with baseline).

Patients also completed the Dermatology Life Quality Index. At the 4-week mark, patients saw a reduction to 8.3 points from the baseline score of 17.6 points (out of a possible 30, with higher scores indicating worse quality of life); scores dropped to 5.4 by week 16 (P less than .001 for both time points, compared with baseline).

Dupilumab was generally well tolerated, with conjunctivitis – seen in 11% of patients – being the most commonly reported adverse event. This falls in line with other recently published real-world studies of dupilumab, Dr. Fargnoli noted.

Efficacy, as measured by EASI reduction and improvement in itch and sleep, were also comparable between the Italian cohort and clinical trial results, as well as other real-life studies in Denmark, France, the Netherlands, and Spain, she said.

Patients, about one-third female, had a mean body mass index of about 24 kg/m2. Mean age was about 38 years (range, 19-80 years). The mean age of disease onset was about 14 years (range, 0-77 years).

Atopic dermatitis was characterized by phenotype for each patient; groupings included classic adult type (73%), nummular dermatitis (7%), prurigo (8%), and erythrodermic dermatitis (12%). About three in four patients (76.1%) had facial involvement; 61.5% had hand involvement, and 22.9% had genital involvement.

Allergic comorbidities were reported by many patients; 44.9% had rhinitis, 38.5% had asthma, 33% had conjunctivitis, and 15.6% reported food allergies. Other notable comorbidities included psychiatric or psychological conditions, present in 11% of patients, and hypertension or other cardiovascular disorders, seen in 9.1% of patients.

Most patients had tried treatment with both cyclosporine A and corticosteroids (88.9% and 88.1%, respectively). Almost half (45.8%) had tried UV-light therapy, and about a quarter had tried methotrexate.

“The results give real-life data on patterns of treatment response according to heterogeneous atopic dermatitis phenotypes, and on long-term efficacy and safety,” said Dr. Fargnoli.

The study was not funded by any company, according to Dr. Fargnoli. She has served on the advisory board for and has received honoraria for lectures and research grants from Sanofi-Genzyme.

Recommended Reading

Role of Diet in Treating Skin Conditions
MDedge Dermatology
Patch testing in atopic dermatitis: when and how
MDedge Dermatology
Atopic dermatitis in adults associated with increased risk of dementia
MDedge Dermatology
Dupilumab for Treatment of Severe Atopic Dermatitis in a Heart Transplant Recipient
MDedge Dermatology
Pustular Tinea Id Reaction
MDedge Dermatology
Treatment Consideration for US Military Members With Skin Disease
MDedge Dermatology
Phototherapy: Is It Still Important?
MDedge Dermatology
Atopic dermatitis patients achieved freedom from itch on JAK inhibitor upadacitinib
MDedge Dermatology
Severity, itch improvements remain steady with ruxolitinib for atopic dermatitis
MDedge Dermatology
Cyclosporine, methotrexate have lowest 6-month infection risk for AD patients
MDedge Dermatology