Original Research

HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP): A Survey of Dermatologists’ Knowledge and Practice Patterns

Author and Disclosure Information

Practice Points

  • Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) often have skin manifestations, with patients presenting to dermatologists.
  • Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uses antiretrovirals taken prophylactically to prevent transmission of and infection with HIV. Dermatologists are aware of PrEP, but several barriers prevent them from being prescribers.
  • Patients with a history of an STI should be considered for PrEP.


 

References

To the Editor:

In a 2010 landmark paper, researchers reported that the Preexposure Prophylaxis Initiative (iPrEx) trial demonstrated that once-daily pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with emtricitabine plus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, which was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and packaged together as Truvada (Gilead Sciences, Inc), achieved a 44% reduction in the incidence of HIV infection compared to the placebo arm of the study (64/1248 HIV infections in the placebo group vs 36/1251 in the intervention group).1 Subsequently, the US Department of Health and Human Services proposed an initiative to reduce new HIV infections by 90% by 2030.2 The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that 1.1 million Americans have an indication for PrEP, yet only approximately 400,000 individuals currently take PrEP.3,4

Increasing awareness of PrEP and its indications is essential because PrEP exerts its greatest benefit when used broadly. Awareness among primary care and infectious disease physicians was reported at 76%5; awareness among other medical specialists remains unknown. Awareness of PrEP among dermatologists is important because dermatologists play an important role in the diagnosis and treatment of many sexually transmitted infections (STIs), which are a risk factor for transmission of HIV. As providers who treat STIs, dermatologists are in a prime position to educate patients about PrEP, refer them for treatment, and prescribe the regimen. We conducted a survey to assess dermatologists’ knowledge about and attitudes toward PrEP. We also provide a brief summary of prescribing information about common PrEP regimens to fill in the knowledge gap among dermatologists as a way to promote its utilization.

An electronic survey was distributed to 486 members of the Association of Professors of Dermatology based in the United States using the web-based survey application REDCap. The study was approved by the New York University Grossman School of Medicine (New York, New York) institutional review board. Eighty-one anonymous survey responses were completed and returned (response rate, 16.6%). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

The mean age (SD) of respondents was 39.1 (9.7) years; 49.4% (40/81) were male; and 74.1% (60/81) were attending physicians, with a mean (SD) of 9.4 (8.6) years of practice. Clinical practices were predominantly from the northeast (46.9% [38/81]) and mostly in an academic setting (74.1% [60/81]). As shown in Table 1, most surveyed dermatologists reported being aware of PrEP (93.8% [76/81]), but a minority (42.0% [34/81]) were familiar with indications for its use; even fewer (4.9% [4/81]) were current prescribers. Referral to other physicians for PrEP was reported by 58.0% (47/81) of respondents.

PrEP Knowledge, Attitudes, and Current Practice Behaviors Among Dermatologists (N=81)

Despite respondents’ awareness of PrEP as a preventive measure (93.8% [76/81]) and their willingness to prescribe it (67.9% [55/81]), many reported being largely unfamiliar with its indications (58.0% [47/81]) and uncomfortable discussing its adverse effects (72.8% [59/81]), conducting appropriate laboratory monitoring (84.0% [68/81]), and refilling existing prescriptions (77.8% [63/81]). Respondents’ lack of education about PrEP was a barrier to prescribing (51.9% [42/81] to 59.3% [48/81]) and explains why a small minority (4.9% [4/81]) currently prescribe the regimen.

Our study sought to characterize current clinical knowledge about and practice patterns of PrEP among dermatologists. Dermatologists often encounter patients who present with an STI, which is a risk factor for HIV infection, but our survey respondents reported several barriers to utilizing PrEP. The difference in the degree of respondents’ willingness to prescribe PrEP (67.9%) and those who self-identified as prescribers (4.9%) suggests a role for dermatologists in prescribing or discussing PrEP with their patients—albeit a currently undefined role.

The results of our study suggested that half (41/81) of dermatologists believe that PrEP prescription is out of their scope of practice, likely due to a combination of scheduling, laboratory monitoring, and medicolegal concerns. For dermatologists who are interested in being PrEP prescribers, our results suggested that closing the knowledge gap around PrEP among dermatologists through training and education could improve comfort with this medication and lead to changes in practice to prevent the spread of HIV infection.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Monkeypox in children and women remains rare, CDC data show
MDedge Dermatology
Autoimmune disease patients’ waxing, waning response to COVID vaccination studied in-depth
MDedge Dermatology
Chlorophyll water can trigger pseudoporphyria, expert warns
MDedge Dermatology
Angiolymphoid Hyperplasia with Eosinophilia in a Patient With Coccidioidomycosis
MDedge Dermatology
Risk Factors Predicting Cellulitis Diagnosis in a Prospective Cohort Undergoing Dermatology Consultation in the Emergency Department
MDedge Dermatology
Punked By the Punctum: Domestically Acquired Cutaneous Myiasis
MDedge Dermatology
Pandemic has helped clinicians to gain better insight on pernio, expert says
MDedge Dermatology
A White male presented with a 1-month history of recurrent, widespread, painful sores
MDedge Dermatology
Early bird gets the worm, night owl gets the diabetes
MDedge Dermatology
Limiting antibiotic overprescription in pandemics: New guidelines
MDedge Dermatology