Latest News

For psoriasis, review finds several biosimilars as safe and effective as biologics


 

FROM JAMA DERMATOLOGY

Experts weigh in

Asked to comment on the study, Steven R. Feldman, MD, PhD, professor of dermatology at Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, N.C., told this news organization that he expects that the results will affect patient care.

However, he added, “I believe the decision of whether to use a biosimilar instead of the originator biologic may be more in the hands of the insurers than in the hands of physicians and patients.

“Biologics for psoriasis are so complicated that even the originator products vary from batch to batch. A biosimilar is basically like another batch of the innovative product,” explained Dr. Feldman, who was not involved in the study. “If we’re comfortable with patients being on different batches of the innovator product, we probably should be comfortable with them being on a biosimilar, as we have more evidence for the similarity of the biosimilar than we do for the current batch of the originator product.”

Aída Lugo-Somolinos, MD, professor of dermatology and director of the Contact Dermatitis Clinic at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, said that “biologics have become the treatment of choice for moderate to severe psoriasis, and the use of biosimilars may be an alternative to reduce psoriasis treatment costs.

“Unfortunately, this study included a comparison of the existing biosimilars, which are drugs that are not the first line of treatment for psoriasis any longer,” added Dr. Lugo-Somolinos, who was not involved in the study.

Neil J. Korman, MD, PhD, professor of dermatology and codirector of the Skin Study Center at Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, said the study was an important systematic review.

“This is a very timely publication because in the United States, several biosimilars are reaching the market in 2023,” he said. “The costs of the originator biologics are extraordinarily high, and the promise of biosimilars is that their costs will be significantly lower.”

Because all the studies were short term, Dr. Korman, who was not involved in the study, joins the study authors in recommending further related research into the long-term safety and efficacy of these agents.

Dr. Feldman, as well as one study author and one editorial author, reported relevant relationships with various pharmaceutical companies, including those that develop biosimilars. The remaining study authors, as well as Dr. Lugo-Somolinos and Dr. Korman, reported no relevant relationships. The study was funded by the Psoriasis Association and supported by the NIHR (National Institute for Health and Care Research) Manchester Biomedical Research Centre. All outside experts commented by email.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Axial spondyloarthritis versus axial psoriatic arthritis: Different entities?
MDedge Dermatology
FDA approves autoinjector pen for Humira biosimilar, Cyltezo
MDedge Dermatology
An Evaluation of Spin in the Abstracts of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses on the Treatment of Psoriasis: A Cross-sectional Analysis
MDedge Dermatology
FDA approves Yuflyma as ninth adalimumab biosimilar
MDedge Dermatology
A Joint Effort to Save the Joints: What Dermatologists Need to Know About Psoriatic Arthritis
MDedge Dermatology
Cell activity in psoriasis may predict disease severity and provide clues to comorbidities
MDedge Dermatology
How does psoriasis affect fertility and birth outcomes?
MDedge Dermatology
After Yusimry’s steep discount, little clarity on future adalimumab biosimilar pricing
MDedge Dermatology
Methotrexate does not impair sperm quality, small study finds
MDedge Dermatology
Does colchicine have a role in treating excess ASCVD risk in patients with chronic inflammatory conditions?
MDedge Dermatology